Jump to content

User talk:National security geek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, National security geek! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please stop inserting original research and false citations in the above article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.172.210.153 (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look, all the sources call it a "destroyer". And, I quote, the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source (see below), not whether editors think it is true. I would like to add, the terms frigate and destroyer are purely arbitrary on a country-by-country basis. Many post-World War 2 US "destroyers" are classified as cruisers by other countries, for example, and the new Zumwalt class being equivalent in tonnage to a WW2 Heavy Cruiser, and rather larger than the contemporary Ticonderoga class cruiser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.172.210.153 (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]



The sources are verifiably wrong. Calling this vessel a destroyer is a gross exaggeration at best.

True this class of ship should be listed as a frigate or corvette but not a Destroyer. De Grasse (talk) 04:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Displacement

[edit]

This class is smaller than the Post World War II built Babr class, a modified Allen M.Sumner Class that displaces 2,200 tons as well as China's, India's, the US's and the UK's destroyer classes in service today.

As noted above this vessel is significantly smaller than a typical destroyer since it displaces 1,400 tons and is 94 meters long. It could perhaps be more appropriately described as a multi-purpose frigate or guided missile frigate rather than a Destroyer or Guided missile destroyer.

Modern destroyers typically displace roughly 3,500 to 9,000 tons. The UK's Type 45 destroyer for example displaces 7,205 tons light load, 8,092 tons full load and a US Arleigh Burke class destroyer 8,315 - 9,200tons full load. The aforementioned World War II era Allen M.Sumner Class displace 2,200 tons standard, 3,515 tons full load.

Based on the ship's configuration, armament, layout, size and intended mission it would be best described as a multi-purpose corvette, frigate or guided missile frigate and a fairly small one by modern standards. A modern MEKO 360 frigate displaces 3,360 tons fully loaded, a MEKO 200 3,400 tons fully loaded and an older Kortenaer class frigate of the Dutch Navy 3,500 tons standard, 3,800 tons full load.

Based on all this evidence this vessel has been incorrectly classified as a destroyer.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, National security geek. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 23:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, National security geek. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 23:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]