Jump to content

User talk:Mellangoose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Mellangoose! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Johnsoniensis, looking forward to contributing! 🪶 📖 Mellangoose (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Henry of Huntingdon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Codices Vossiani Latini

[edit]

Hi there. Saw your comment on the Phabricator ticket about Brill online. If you're subscribed to that ticket, you will have seen my reply, but if you're not, I'll mention here that although the Codices Vossiani Latini Online project is not currently available for WP Library readers, the full text of the printed catalogue is available; the catalogue of folio mss. is here, and the one you're interested in, Voss. Lat. F4, is described on pp. 6–9. Of course, that won't satisfy you if you want to see the scan of the manuscript itself, but if you're simply looking for codicological and bibliographical information, it might be sufficient. Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 14:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]