User talk:IdreamofJeanie

This user may have left Wikipedia. IdreamofJeanie has not edited Wikipedia since October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I do not understand the reason for having undone my edit reverting the image on the page to that which has served well for a long time. The image which you have replaced it with includes elements of psychological deviance which are not associated with the subject in question and bring the subject of the page with one of disrepute. Dollist (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to British Isles, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Please refrain from disingenuity. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your "point-to-prove" disruptive edits which are clearly against discussion on talk page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Which element of my edits fall in this category? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is my "point-to-prove"? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is clearly against discussion on talk page? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you even taking part in any discussion when you ignore every answer. This shows a clear absence of faith in the other editors IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but what answer have I ignored? Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community and the collaborative atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks or even bans. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Often the best way to respond to an isolated personal attack is to simply ignore it. I shall endeavour to follow this policyJorgeLaArdilla (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before rushing in to deleting a request on a Talk page, do read what it says!

No 'self promotion' - as the poetess died 500 years ago, and I've published zilch about her! Or are you trying to gag and sensor minoritized language info? Gwerful Mechain (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my error. when user Gweful Mechain writes about the wonderful poetry of Gwerful Mechain, it is easy to misread, sorry. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of User:Hris Asnv/sandbox. At first I agreed with your nomination, but on closer examination I formed the impression that it was probably being used for preparation of material for the encyclopaedia, albeit in a not very appropriate way. At the very least, it's not so blatantly obvious a misuse as to justify speedy deletion, so any deletion should go through WP:MFD. JBW (talk) 13:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the use of recorded is unnecessary here due to the fact that "12th-verified oldest man of all time" is in the following sentence. MattSucci (talk) 10:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MattSucci, I believe it is needed, for exactly the same reason "verified" is used in the sentence you have quoted, but i am not going to argue over it if you want to change it again. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly isn't of extreme importance. I simply wanted to explain my position, so I will leave it how it originally was ;) Regards, MattSucci (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]