User talk:Galicus1

Welcome!

Hello, Galicus1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.--RJFF (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Left-wing nationalism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Galicus1, please make yourself familiar with Wikipedia's main policies, i.e. WP:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. In the article Left-wing nationalism, you have cited several sources, that do not qualify for the criteria of reliable sources. Indymedia, blogs, and other self-published sources are no reliable sources. Other sources, like this one, do not even mention "left-wing" or "nationalism". We need neutral, third-party and scholarly sources, preferably published by renowned publishers or in peer-reviewed journals. Partisan sources that sympathise with or oppose the subject of the article are also deprecated. Therefore your additions are still not verified with reliable sources and cannot be accepted on Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding. --RJFF (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galician Nationalist Bloc, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aralar and ERC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Galician People's Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Radical Left

Sortu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Internationalism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nationalisms and regionalisms of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

qfwqqf

Cariariko (talk) 02:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]