User talk:Finngall/Archive04

Hi,

I am in the process of editing and re-writing the entry. I want to provide information on an environmental direct action that has been happening over the last 15 years across Canada. I noticed that the Vancouver Sun Run has such an entry so wanted to also write one up for GCSC. I do work for GCSC, but if you can help me edit it to be more neutral, I would love your help.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vancouver cigegret (talk • contribs) 22:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I have re-created it with changes, can you advise if it still needs to be altered?? Thank you.--Vancouver cigegret (talk) 23:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finngall, I need to talk to you about the deletion of the Marc Abraham biography that I posted earlier. It was deleted because it was found on the web site www.hollywoodjesus.com which mentions one of his movies, "Tuck Everlasting" and has Marc's bio as information on the producer. That bio was obtained from Marc Abraham's office and written by me, it isn't a problem that they have used it but it is hindering my ability to post an updated version of his bio on Wikipedia. What do you suggest I do?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.113.92.25 (talk • contribs)

Leaving reply at User talk:Angellotti. --Finngall ^talk 22:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donray article was marked as spam. Why? He is a NY artist and those are real quotes by famous critics who are already on Wikipedia. Please help I hate being accused of advertisement. Drewhamilton (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again? My "helpme" has been taken away. Do I write to you on my talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewhamilton (talk • contribs) 23:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normally the helpme tag should be placed on one's own talk page if they are requesting help. I've replied on your talk page. --Finngall ^talk 23:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to log out to make changes for some reason. I deleted the first quote from Ruth Bass cause she's not on Wikipedia but is a famous ArtNews writer nonetheless. I don't want to cut down the bibliography it's not like it's monstrously large. All those critics are famous. I looked a other artist entries before doing my own first one of course and most of them have extensive critical quotes and reviews. I hope this is fixed up. Drewhamilton (talk) 23:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Finngall. Do not hesitate to delete that article. Your allowed to delete it if you saw I was wrong. But remember once you start to create an article, not only you who are going to accomplish it! If you saw there's any mistake has been done on Frank article, why don't you provide those reference? Ok, no need to blame each other it's bettr to tell yah where I got that information. From IMDB, so it's allowed to write such a reference?--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 04:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing you did in that article. I'm sorry to tell you that if I have not seen any movement in that article except "deletion tag". What your going to do with that article? You have to wait till the day which is going to be deleted, Cheers....--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 11:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined to speedy Tex bronson because fictional character do not qualify for A7 and only very obvious hoax are speediable, instead I have listed it for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tex bronson. Thank you. Jon513 (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the Stellar School System page. Could you please have a look and if its good enough now remove the advert tag. If you think its still not alright let me know what needs to be done. Thank you!

Jalal

Hi, you placed a COI tag on this page last week, and I was hoping you could elaborate there in the talk page. I believe the page uses neutral language and does not appear slanted. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

AustinAlta (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry, I dont know where to put my answer)

Hi, I`m from Peru..I speak spanish and I speak english too but so-so, well, I saw the page "Lis of ROH events", Then I began to create pages as List of ECW events, CZW events, JAPW events, PWG events, and, (of course) FIP events, all the information of the official events I have removed them of the official pages of the organizations, in the list I have placed events that has a "Title", excluding thus the House Show. The idea to help to create these pages due to that Ring of Honor had this type of pages and these companies not. Good I thought to go improving it little by little, but if Wikipedia thinks that the page should not be, then that be eliminated. There is not problem with me, greetings, Eric

User:Ericystephi 21:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had asked User talk:Arunvroy not to move an article. I am having the same problem with him. A third party pointed out that an article could be locked against moves while it is being discussed. I would do this myself if I understood the problem better. My axe is simply to try to get his attention which might happen if he couldn't do something he wanted to do! :) Student7 (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to make anything inapropriate on Wikipedia if it seems that I appologize I am only trying to make a page for my show I am making on Youtube... if there any way I can change the page into make it proper please let me know I willing to do almost anything within reason to keep the page going

Yours Truly Daniel Levesque —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gohan326 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it would you delete the 'Field Days' page and I'll expand the 'Club Days' page to discusses this whole theme of village celebrations in northern England.

TTFN

Watcher328 (talk) 10:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, AfD is fine for that, and as you say he probably fails the WP:ATHLETE guideline. Persons who have been signed to a professional sports team aren't really speedy candidates since their very signing is an indication that they might be notable. I doubt it will survive AfD.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 20:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sister Ruth" Dixon has been recreated as Sister Ruth Dixon per the request of the author. However, even with my edits I cannot find anything which will keep this article alive. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have PRODed a number of fictional character--wouldnt they be better changed to redirect to the show or a list of characters for the show? They appear to be reasonable search terms. DGG (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion by you of personal attacks being banned is not entirely correct. The Wiki item states that one cannot have unsourced or Poorly sourced articles

Everything stated in the TBF report was True.

It also sourced the Online Affidavit.

If it makes you feel better, I can testify to the items under penalty of perjury on here as well. It is our case, but it is Your System of Justice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laserhaas (talk • contribs)

Your statement of mindset on the policy of Wiki, that being that no article can be started by anyone "connected" to the issue, as such is a conflict of interest, is an Illogical statement.

No one is going to post any item that is not of their interest!

If you have any interest in Justice, of an issue of National importance, you would seek to have another investigate the facts and post them (if your inference is true and correct).

The explanations and how to's of Wiki is a learning experience. To threaten persons with explusion, is dishearting to say the least.

eToys went public for $8bn and broke a year later with no investigation. The powers that be behind the saga are so staunch and high up, that key Dept of Justice persons resign, rather than prosecute and the L A Times reported on the disbanding of the Public Corruption Unit with threats against career prosecutors, if they didnot keep their mouths shut.

Even the WSJ reporters were ordered OFF The story after we discovered that the US Attorney in Delaware was a partner with the law firm in 2001, that confessed to filing false affidavits and decpetions of the court in 2001.

You are stating, in essence, because no one else has the chutzpah to state the story, that I should refrain and keep silent.

It is such apathy and willful deaf ears that permits cronyism, corruption and manifest injustice in the first place.

Is it NOT enough for you that my website shows Online, that it is all stated Under Penalty of Perjury, my allegations against the Dept of Justice.

If I am willing to put myself in harms way, taking on the Giant of the DOJ, having paid an aweful price of demise of career and more

can you be such an administrator as one who would condemn the truth, under color of policy?

Stand up and Fight for your American way of Life or LET IT GO! Laserhaas (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing good patrolling! A hint: you might want to consider leaving people a link to WP:BFAQ in appropriate cases--what it says is actually helpful when its a question of G11 or non-notable companies or copying a web site--more I think than the standard tags.. Just one thing--Please use the recreation of deleted material tag only when the material was deleted by AfD or other XfD, not when it was merely someone putting back an article that had previously been speedied. Just use the same tag as before that applies to the situation. The deleting admin will check the history, see the previous attempts, and consider whether further action is necessary in addition to the deletion. And of course don't pay much attention to comments like the above--see WP:DENY. DGG (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You chose to redirect my page on Tord, who is a member of the Wombats, why did you change what I made? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Besley2008 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Finngall (of Manx descent)

I put the Broadjam page together because there wasn't one. While I can't argue that it may at times seem 'advertisement-like', I assure you that is not my intention. In point of fact, it states some simple facts about the service that Broadjam offers.

In preparation for writing the article I used Last.fm as a guide. I don't believe that the article for last.fm is very different in quality, or content, than that for Broadjam.

Lastly, since there was no current article for Broadjam I felt that it deserved one, it being a very popular service to starving musicians (such as myself), and so I went ahead and created one using whatever knowledge was available.

If you could perhaps be so kind as to make some notes on the Broadjam article's talk page as to what it is lacking, and what needs to be done to get it into a 'fit state'.

Thank you! sugarfish (talk) 03:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasper4670 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Finngall,

Recently you deleted the articles I have created (ReaSoft Converter; PDF Printer ReaSoft) under the criteria of speedy deletion. Probably this has been done because the artice seemed to be adrvertising, though I didn't want to make that impression. By now I reviewed them and deleted all the material which may sound advertising. Now they sound neutral. Please tell me if I have a chance to publish them now. What are the steps that I should take to publish them in Wikipedia.

Thank you,

Looking forward to hearing from you soon

--Vein eater (talk) 09:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HI, I was trying to create the article, "Steve Friess" and it keeps getting deleted and I don't understand why. Other journalists who write for well known publications are included on wikipedia, but before I have time to explain this it is being deleted. How many first page articles does a person need to be considered 'notable'?--Coffeegirlyme (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put down that mallet and let me know if you have any ideas for this article. Especially in the realm of Classical and any other random crap you can stir up in your brain from the 1970s and '80s... Can't let the article suffer from recentism and systemic bias... Katr67 (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don Latarski. Notable? He's cited under slash chord. Katr67 (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

My 5/29/08 List of INFORMS Publications posting, along with pages for our scientific society's individual journals, was blocked and removed with reasons given as conflict of interest, copyright infringement, and blatant advertisement.

I am the INFORMS Director of Communications. I posted these pages relying on the model of our sister society IEEE in their List of Publications at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IEEE_publications. The IEEE page also appears to have been posted by a society staffer in a nearly identical way to mine. Please let me know how I can apply the guidelines so that INFORMS, like IEEE, complies.

Thanks. BarryList 14:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not take this whole experience personally, and please don't think that we don't want you around. The fact that this account was blocked had nothing to do with your contributions--it was solely because the name was considered a violation of the username policy. I do hope you'll continue to contribute here--you are absolutely free to start a new account under a new name. I know that for a "free encyclopedia" it seems like we have a lot of rules around here, but it's all in the interest of making this the best encyclopedia it can be. If you do create a new username, please shoot me a message on my talk page and I'll send back a welcome message that contains many useful links on Wikipedia's policies and procedures. If you want to respond to me here on this page, that's cool too--while the account is blocked for editing articles, you can still leave messages here. Thanks, and take care. --Finngall talk 19:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Internal_Terrorist"

I am now User:Panyé El Skat-e-board-ér I have now (so far) successfully reinstated the article:"Skateboarding Sponsorship" - you should check it out and tell me if it is wikiworth...but you should hurry before it gets deleted again...it probably will Communicate via my User talk:Panyé El Skat-e-board-ér —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panyé El Skat-e-board-ér (talk • contribs) 16:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm not an established registered user I can not edit semi protected articles

I think that the article "Skateboarding sponsorship" should be added to Template:Skateboarding under "other" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panyé El Skat-e-board-ér (talk • contribs) 18:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping us out --Panyé El Skat-é-board-ér 18:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I need help fixing an article. I've left a comment with information on the topic at Talk:Vert Skateboarding on what I think should be done - I was hoping you could shed some light on the matter at hand

--Panyé El Skat-é-board-ér 04:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, apologies if this is in the wrong place, the interface here is taking some getting used to :) I posted an article on the Loyalty Association because they were being spoken about/interviewed on BBC Radio 2 at the time. I figured that was pretty topical?--Phreak79 (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I just had to give someone a kitten. You're the lucky winner. Cheers! Katr67 (talk) 19:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such all articles need to maintain a neutral point of view at all times. Phrases such as "...is the new revolution", "the newest paradigm shift to occur in our time", and "It is as momentous as the Industrial Revolution" are the stuff of advertisements, not encyclopedia articles, and have no place here. Please also refer to Wikipedia's manual of style for the usual standards in formatting an article. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 18:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you posted this at user:Metapsyche when I was checking into the advertizing nature of the new main referencing for the exoplanetology article. It is Google sponsered and I wonder if this editor didn't just obscond with the data using a redirect to make their own new science article for advertizing links. 198.163.53.10 (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am JD's manager and have been having quite the time trying to write a wiki article about him and getting it to stay. I went ahead and updated more information on there and would like to know if there is anything else I need to know or if this will be fine and can be moved to it's own page. It's under JayDeeComedy right now and I would like for it to be on it's own page Comedian_Jay_Dee or something similar that you find apropriate. Thanks,

Bruce Jennings —Preceding unsigned comment added by JayDeeComedy (talk • contribs) 21:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is what I did considered vandalism? Anheuser-Busch is no longer a public comapny, it ceased trading on 11/17/08. It is now a wholly owned susidiary of InBev. AB is no longer a stand alone company.

-Cmalpass

I have been trying to create the page for the group Boxbomb. I am their manager, but I believe I have written an unbiased entry. I have not critiqued the band or suggested anything that encourages people to buy/listen to them. I have also provided no links to their music. It is merely facts on the page.

I am new to Wikipedia, so if I am writing this in the wrong place, I am sorry. I started an account to add this page because one of their fans said he was unable to do so.

--Mreklis (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• In the end, I have removed the speedy deletion notice from the article, as it makes a claim of notability per WP:MUSIC - two albums at a somewhat notable label. I recognize that the article has been speedily deleted several times, so if you believe it isn't notable enough, feel free to nominate the page for deletion. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll consider it, but I'll give him time to improve the article first. --Finngall ^talk 21:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finngall,

Do you have any suggestions for editing the Karlsberger page to make it acceptable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmarketing (talk • contribs) 22:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is in reference to an article I wrote about Celebrated Actor Alejandro Alcondez I have some questions that need to be address, the reason is that not averyone can really verify all the famous people out in the world, It's a fact that there are a lot of them wich do not necesarily have the output or media time, or even info on the Internet but are well known in different circles, now it's imposible to say what goes and what does not just by searching on the web it's irresponsible not checking on other sources.

I tried to find what I could but have had first hand experiance from different movies from the past wich did not make it to the US market ... but is this a requeriment to be on the US market for notability ?? many important figures from different time periods wich are not on the web , not everything is online for a variety of reasons and this being an online service for regular people to contribute and help build resources there is no limit to say what is most notable to be used as reference only on tradicitional Encylopedias do you have too choose what is the most important (notable) items because of limited pages... this is not an article about a home-movie maker or some other personal video, it's about an Actor wich many people know.

First of all most if not all of these films are shot on 35MM and 16MM and not filmed off of a digital camera (this information can be found on the actual movies that are released on video after theatrical release, these movies can be found at Walmart, Kmart, Amazon, EBay etc.). For someone to assume that these films were shot on a digital camera is insulting (please note all of the well known famous actors).

It seems that this article was removed for lack of "notability" unless you view/research the films and what the budget, format, actors, locations, etc. how can you assume that the quality of work does not exist.

As far as the significant viewer following, this actor has been filming for many years and continues to film with other famous actors, besides how do you determine that he does not have significant viewer following.

Please allow me as you allow others that have created Wikipedia pages for other actors to post Mr. Alejandro Alcondez on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgomez007 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to policy stated here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks I was not in violation of any Wikipedia Policy. Please explain why my edit was undone and I was threatened with a block. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowenisgay (talk • contribs) 18:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the sarcasm; sometimes my sense of humor leaks out at the wrong times. I mean no derision. I also appreciate that you withdrew the nomination when you saw the content that was added. I appreciate your efforts to make wikipedia a better resource, and hope you accept my apology. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 05:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not get what is wrong with my page and are why you are trying to delete it. So either read my article's talk page so you can accept my article. So can you just stop hassling me and tell me what's wrong with my page and what can I do to fix it.Yoshi675 (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry finngall but i cant find any articles on him,but i really want to keep this page up. Would it matter that i said it was a stub? And is there any way you could let this page slide? You know, not delete it? Put your response on my talk page.

Aren't there seven continents? My R.E.M. badge circa 1986 says so... http://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/music/rem-faq/part1.html Katr67 (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I don't think we've speedied any Antarctican bands yet...if I'm wrong, let me know. ("The Vostok Vipers is an up-and-coming band that was formed in late 2008 when Yuri and Sergei decided to put a band together. We came in second in a local Battle of the Bands competition and we hope to put out a record this year.")  :-P --Finngall ^talk 15:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! I was just about to pop over here to let you know I declined the speedy but that I was toying with bringing it to AfD myself. Looks like I don't need to do that. :) --Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously I didn't actually READ the preview... thank you. :) sinneed (talk) 21:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Finngall ^talk 21:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC) (aka Griliam Girmanen, 76 Warrior on The Combine... :-) )[reply]

OY, and then I put December on the date flag. *scribbles out the change*. I really, honestly, can type. Evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.sinneed (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Finngall!

Thanks for your feedback on Mr. Gillen. While I do know he is a well-renowned director and producer of several reality television shows, I did notice he wasn't referred to in any other articles or lists, so I trust your judgment regarding the deletion. Thanks for clearing this up! Keep up the good work.

PS: I had a little question maybe you could clarify for me (if you have the time). When I created the page for 'Scott Gillen', I attempted to do so with the proper capitalization of his last name, however, it still came out as "Scott gillen" (with a lowercase 'g'). Is this because he wasn't referred to in any other articles or lists? If so, I think I will send a message to his agent or publicist to see about getting him on some of the proper Wikipedia lists, and also have them get more citations or references to demonstrate that he is a noteworthy enough person for an entry on Wikipedia. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeejayGPS (talk • contribs) 22:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on your suggestions and find others who can possibly add to its notability. I've learned a lot in the last six months and hope to become a better Wikipedian this year. Deterring underage drinking accidents is notable to many others.

Best Regards,

Freshmenz (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Finngall,

Thanks for the quick response! I don't know if I'll have the time (or interest) to do the proper research, citations and edits necessary to make this proposed article more relevant and worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. For how long do you think a {hangon} tag would be appropriate (in general)? I ask this more for future reference than for this article in particular. Again, any response to this would be greatly appreciated, as I am still familiarizing myself with some of the proper standards and etiquette of Wikipedia. Also, is there a way for me to mark other articles for speedy deletion for similar reasons, or is that purely the role of administrators such as yourself?

Thanks once again for your response! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeejayGPS (talk • contribs) 04:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting to you, I've done what you suggested in my user page User:Cgomez007/Alejandro Alcondez in order to expand on the article about Alejandro Alcondez, iv'e came across an article wich was added to the references that talks about the actor and it seems to me the it is an independant publication, is it do you thik a reliable source? [[1]] is in Spanish but it clearly states some facts about the actor, in your opinion was this considered when the review was in progress? because the only references given was only about Youtube and IMDB. Thanks for your time to respond User:Cgomez007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.77.199.252 (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for reverting my user page. (*thumbs up*) THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 17:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Comsec Consulting Ltd.. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Any input? Talk:Eugene Station#Ideas for expansion. Katr67 (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finngall,

There has been this discussion before, I know, but please let me know what speaks against using the Timeline from zurich.com (http://www.zurich.com/main/about/whoweare/history/chronology.htm) or at least the most relevant parts of it in the history section of Zurich Financial Services’ entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zurich_Financial_Services).

As a Zurich employee, I am still trying to find a way to make the page more useful and relevant for all Wikipedia users, without any PR-ing it. My bosses are well aware of it (I told them about the do's and don't's), so I wish to work together with you on it.

Thank you for any advice! Oliver

Me and my friendhsip have worked hard on the page providing it with information that is useful and you keep removing it, if you could please stop because you didnt create the page either so let the creators edit it please.CFluver07 (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Finngall. I think Fernando Dagnino's entry at the wikipedia is completely justified. Especially since he is catalogued by several sources in Spain as a young talent part of the group of famous Spanish comics artists. He is also a colleague of Daniel Acuña and his biography and achivements are higher of those reached by Raulo Cáceres, both in the wikipedia. He is also the penciller of the new series of Superman, which I think is relevant enough to be here. I am very new at the wikipedia and I don't know how to categorize his entrance within the "Spanish Comics Authors". I think once he is included in that category it would make more sense for him to be here. Thank you very much for your reply.Emurri (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Finngall. I think Fernando Dagnino's entry at the wikipedia is completely justified. Especially since he is catalogued by several sources in Spain as a young talent part of the group of famous Spanish comics artists. He is also a colleague of Daniel Acuña and his biography and achivements are higher of those reached by Raulo Cáceres, both in the wikipedia. He is also the penciller of the new series of Superman, which I think is relevant enough to be here. I am very new at the wikipedia and I don't know how to categorize his entrance within the "Spanish Comics Authors". I think once he is included in that category it would make more sense for him to be here. Thank you very much for your reply.Emurri (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to put the link in my previous message Fernando Dagnino Guerra Looking forward for your reply.Emurri (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello it's been some time since my last post, my question how do I request the re-admission of the article Alejandro Alcondez, I've seen some info on the web regarding recent info about a movie called Cielito Lindo. Please advice how to proceed, thank you. 03:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgomez007 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for letting me know, i was not aware of this. KiraChinmoku _{(Talk, My Contribs)} 14:31, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need your input on a mostly completely unrelated-to-Wikipedia conversation here. Ta, Katr67 (talk) 23:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Including one nestled at the base of the lovely and idyllic Skinner's [sic] Butte.

• Citizens Building (Eugene)
• Willamette Towers
• Ya-Po-Ah Terrace

Speediable IYHO? Please?

Katr67 (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much woth keeping here. Do we have building geeks who have conceived of standards for whether the Nth largest building in X City is considered notable? --Finngall ^talk 13:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. Some of the info is probably merge-able, but where? Is the Eugene article still horrible? I don't dare look. Katr67 (talk) 00:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Finngall/Archive04! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey