User talk:BootleggerWill

Hello, BootleggerWill! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks for uploading File:Kum Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stealin'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Stealin' (Bob Dylan bootleg), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealin' (Bob Dylan bootleg). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your recent contribution to the "Mr. Tambourine Man" article. I have reformatted the inline ref that you provided in keeping with other refs used in the article, because myself and a number of other editors are attempting to push this article up to Featured Article status. I just wondered if you could confirm that the edition of The Rough Guide to Bob Dylan that you cited was the 2nd edition with the ISBN number 1-84353-718-2. I don't own the book myself and it would be a big help if you could let me know whether it is page 268 of this edition of the book or another edition that you are citing. Many thanks. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking the time to clarify this for me. It is very much appreciated. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Bob Dylan 1966.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bob Dylan and the Band Tour 1966.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stealin'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bob Dylan Acoustic '66.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bob Dylan w-his electric guitar.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BootleggerWill, you ask about reliable reference books. You probably know the following are highly rated:

• Heylin, Clinton (2003). Bob Dylan: Behind the Shades Revisited. Perennial Currents. ISBN 0-06-052569-X.
• Sounes, Howard (2001). Down The Highway: The Life Of Bob Dylan. Grove Press. ISBN 0-8021-1686-8.

This one is interesting because it is a detailed chronological account of Dylan, enabling you to check concerts & dates:

• Heylin, Clinton (1996). Bob Dylan: A Life In Stolen Moments. Book Sales. ISBN 0711956693.

On the whole Bjorner is accurate. One problem is that when shooting for FA, other editors may question whether Bjorner is a reliable source. Please cite Bjorner in proper format, eg [1], rather than just inserting the raw link. I looked at the 1966 World Tour in Heylin's A Life In Stolen Moments against Bjorner just now, and I was surprised to find there seem to be concerts missing from Bjorner. February 19, Ottawa. February 20, Quebec. February 24, Philadelphia. March 3, Miami. March 11, St Louis. March 12, Lincoln NE. March 13, Denver. March 24, Portland OR. March 25, Seattle. April 22, Adelaide. April 23, Perth.

Just looked at the Bob Dylan World Tour 1966 article and many of the concerts seems to be there. I could try to clean up the list of concerts when I have time, but unfortunately I'm busy with The Basement Tapes and with life. Looking at the article, I must admit I don't like the writing at all. I find this wildly over-written and subjective:

Dylan's new attitude toward the audience, his critics and his style, however, were now beyond their command or comprehension, and so was his music. His ordeals with the press by this time had reduced him to a complete dissociative state during interviews and the general public. Only on stage could he let his ideas run free. But now he was different. He was the iconic psychedelic prophet of things to come; shouting surrealistic parables atop the mercurial carnival sounds of the band and gesturing wildly. Unfortunately the uproar over his new style would alienate the majority of his initial audience and many of his friends in the music industry (most notably Phil Ochs). This, and his recent marriage—which was, by this time, slowly unraveling, lead him to an increasing dependence on amphetamine, barbiturates, and alcohol. In the Feinstein documentary, he speculates (as many others have) that the motorcycle crash of July 29, 1966 was staged, and it was actually Dylan's bitterness toward the press and fans which caused him to withdraw into Woodstock, New York.

Why did Highway 61 reach number 3 on the charts and Blonde On Blonde reach number 9 on the charts if he had alienated most of his fans? They were more successful than his previous albums. This stuff is not consistent with the more reliable biographies, Sounes & Heylin. I think the ref to his marriage unravelling is ludicrous. How do you know? Feinstein's speculation is odd. All the evidence suggests Dylan had some kind of accident [2] but he then obviously capitalized on it to withdraw from the demands of touring and get some R&R. The version of events recounted in The Basement Tapes is I think more sober and more accurate. Mick gold (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm glad you don't like the material either. You should be bold & delete anything you're not happy with. Mick gold (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BootleggerWill. Sorry to get back to you so late about your request for sources for Dylan's 1966 tour. To be honest I don't know very much about his 1966 tour and don't have any good sources myself. All I can tell you that Mick gold didn't tell you above is that Robert Shelton's No Direction Home has a wee wee bit of info in Chapter 10 "One Foot on the Highway . . ." He doesn't mention many specific dates, but does talk about some of the cities played in certain time periods which could be a reference for comparing against other ones. I don't know if it's accurate, but according to Shelton, Dylan played in Tacoma around the time of his Seattle and Vancouver shows, which I don't see in your list of concerts. I haven't looked carefully, but there may be other differences or confirmations of some of the info you already have. I'm not sure if this is a help, but it is all I know. Take care. Moisejp (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno if you can use this as a source on Wikipedia (?), but certainly as an informal source for yourself to track down other sources with, but dylanstubs.com has lots of ticket stubs and posters from the 1966 tour. There are posters for a March 27 show at Spokane Coliseum, March 13 at Denver City Auditorium, neither of which are on your list. In addition to his 4/20 show in Melbourne, he appears to have played on 4/19 there as well. There may be others, I didn't look too carefully. Moisejp (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all of the concert dates presumably missing from Bjorner are not missing. I don't have Stolen Moments but have checked Bjorner against other sources, including Shelton, Sounes and Heylin's Behind the Shades. The only dates Bjorner doesn't list are Feb-19 Ottawa and Feb-20 Quebec. Also, Bjorner correctly gives Feb 24-25 for Philadelphia. I presume Stolen Moments does as well, but disagree that Bjorner missed Feb-24. Allreet (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I missed a discrepancy. Bjorner lists Mar-24 Tacoma WA and Mar-25 Seattle WA, but doesn't include Portand. Mick indicates Mar-24 Portland and Mar-25 Seattle are covered by Stolen. However, DylanStubs has a stub for Portland on Mar-23. In sum, the Portland concert is not covered by Bjorner and apparently the date is incorrect in Stolen. Also note, I have no idea whether Stolen includes the Tacoma date. Allreet (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the above. I've done a more thorough analysis and posted the results on Talk:Bob Dylan World Tour 1966. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.88.228 (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BootleggerWill, you seem to be responsible for adding this picture and caption [3] to the Bob Dylan article.

Purpose: To display Bob Dylan's use of drugs, as described by his expression. This description can be found in the caption below the picture.

Have you read WP:BLP? Don't you realise that this kind of caption writing will get you banned? Mick gold (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can obtain isbn numbers from amazon. [4] Mick gold (talk) 22:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or you can find it in the Bob Dylan article [5] ISBN 0-8021-1686-8.

Hi BootleggerWill, I've edited Bob Dylan World Tour 1966 for reasons discussed here [6]. Mick gold (talk) 17:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question for you: do you think there should be an individual section on drug use during that time? After all, it was influencing Dylan pretty heavily at the time. I agree, it was rather overwritten, and I should've noticed it earlier, but I do believe that there should be some information about drug use in that article. Do you? Thanks! The Gates of Eden (^{Talkin' Gates of Eden Blues}) 03:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do NOT think there should be discussion of Dylan's drug use. Please let us not discuss this issue any more. Mick gold (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am relatively new to Wikipedia, so please excuse my unfamiliarity with procedures and customs. You may or may not know that another user "corrected" your listing of "Before The Flood" as the source of the "Most Likely You Go Your Way (And I'll Go Mine)" track on "Biograph," noting that the "Biograph" version was not live and matched the length of the "Blonde On Blonde" version — to which that user changed the attribution.

I just compared my CD tracks of "Most Likely You Go Your Way (And I'll Go Mine)" from "Blonde On Blonde," "Before The Flood," and "Biograph." The "Biograph" version quite clearly is an edited version of the 1974 Dylan/Band live recording, with the initial 39 seconds and closing 8 seconds of audience ambience removed, which is why the edited length is virtually (and, more importantly, coincidentally) identical to the studio version on "Blonde On Blonde."

I therefore changed the listing back to what you had entered, which was correct.

˜˜˜˜ John Longville longville@mac.com

Thanks for uploading File:Biograph.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:01 Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts sample.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 16:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Folk Rogue cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Little White Wonder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FBDOuttakes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OMRFOuttakes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Little White Wonder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FBDOuttakes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OMRFOuttakes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Folk Rogue cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Barbecue Bob.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BootleggerWill. I noticed you did a lot of work on the Dylan bootleg article and thought you'd be a good person to run this by. I'm trying to de-orphan The Masked Marauders and felt a blurb in the bootleg article would be appropriate. One possibility is to insert a one- or two-liner, though I don't think that would do it justice. The alternative is a short draft I've written (five sentences), possibly under the heading "Faux bootleg":

The release of the Great White Wonder gave birth to a fake bootleg that began as a gag concocted by editors at Rolling Stone magazine. The album, The Masked Marauders, was supposedly recorded during a jam session between Dylan, Mick Jagger, John Lennon, and Paul McCartney. A review of the non-existent album ran in Rolling Stone on October 18, 1969. The write-up sparked numerous inquiries from readers, and a band was hired to record first some singles, then a full album. Released in November 1969 under a Warner Bros. subsidiary created as part of the stunt, The Masked Marauders topped 100,000 in sales.

Overall, I think it's a great story, but then again, as the primary editor I'm a bit prejudiced. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent suggestion. I just hate to trammel others' good works and didn't want to bull ahead. Not that anyone has a franchise or anything, but it's good form to take into account the conceptions of others. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article In 1966 There Was has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable bootleg LP, mostly sourced to a self-published fansite

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zimmerman Looking Back has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable bootleg LP, sourced mainly to self-published fansite

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Zimmerman Looking Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BootleggerWill. You have new messages at North8000's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

On 25 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Today! (Mississippi John Hurt album), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mississippi John Hurt's (pictured) 1966 album Today! was one of the 25 recordings added to the National Recording Registry in 2009? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

The article The Lonesome Sparrow Sings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Minnesota Tapes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Genuine Bootleg Series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Genuine Bootleg Series Take 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Third One Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Complete Lost Lennon Tapes Volumes 1–2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boot.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Complete Lost Lennon Tapes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boot.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Genuine BLS cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Genuine BLS2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MinnesotaTapes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ThirdOneNowBLS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Lonesome Sparrow Sings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ten of Swords (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are hundreds of Dylan boots--no assertion of notability for this one.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article A Tree with Roots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are hundreds of Dylan boots--no assertion of notability for this one.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tenofswordsjapan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TenofSwords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ExileMainSt.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie Patton studio portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bob Dylan Acoustic '66.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bob Dylan and the Band Tour 1966.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:B Dylan Main '66.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bob Dylan bootleg recordings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly reliant upon a single unreliable source. Useful bits can be folded into Bob Dylan.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Dylan bootleg recordings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Dylan bootleg recordings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Dease, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julliard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Reverend.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Furry-Lewis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:BlowingUnauthorized.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, not the official cover as it is unauthorized.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheGreatestLuvofAll 13:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BlowingUnauthorized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]