User talk:AlphaGamma1991/Archive 2

Archives

/Archive 1

Please refrain from changing original holidays to your fabricated ones. National Holidays need to be respected and changing the whole article just to please one's ego is not an ethical thing. Please consider this request. Fahadeng (talk • contribs) 13:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tareen, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AlphaGamma1991, I have replied to your comments at the Orangi Town talk page. I look forward to hearing from you over there. Best wishes, Anupam^Talk 16:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Transworld Associates, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: TWA-1 (cable system). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Sindh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Muhammad Hussain Panhwar, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://panhwar.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some friendly advice:

1. It is inappropriate to have the same content twice in one article. You put the same series of sentences twice in the Karachi article. So I removed one of them. You put it back. I can't imagine why. Especially as you don't provide any edit summaries with your edits. Once per article is enough for any paragraph.
2. I placed a {{when?}} tag next to your statement that "The original population of Karachi was..." because "original" is too vague. Instead of simply removing the tag, which obviously is an inappropriate and inadequate response to a request for clarification, I would recommend that you rewrite the sentence to specify what specific decade you are referring to.
3. You have a habit of undoing grammatical fixes that are utterly benign and uncontroversial, such as my fix of "was Balochis" to "consisted of Balochis". I don't know if you are doing this out of carelessness or simply a weak grasp of proper English, but I urge you to exercise more caution with your reversions.
4. Much of the frustration you are causing could be averted by making use of the edit summary box to explain the rationale behind your edits. That way your edits won't exist in a vaccuum, and everyone will better be able to understand your intentions. Communication helps.

AtticusX (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead.

Using detailed edit summaries is the best way to ensure that your good faith edits are not reverted by recent changes patrollers or other wikieditors. Thanks and happy editing! — SpikeToronto 17:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to William III of England. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — SpikeToronto 17:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for friendly advice. I will add edit summaries but it takes time to change habits. In William III of England, I added the link from non-trinitarians to non-trinitarians as it it is better link. I was watching PBS show on British history last night. Thanks again. AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— SpikeToronto 18:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Manjhoo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Abro. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The name of North-West Frontier Province was changed to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. I made the move but some mistake occurred and talk did not move. Can you please check and fix it. Thanks. AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes the move happened with an error with that article moved to the talk page, and Favonian reverting the move. As suggested by Favonian please talk about the move using the WP:RM as this might be controversial, and consensus should be proved first. You will now need to ask an admin to do the move as there is too much history behind the redirect now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • A similar (though not identical) attempt was made by another editor, so I have now opened a "formal" discussion at Talk:North-West Frontier Province#Requested move which I invite you to contribute to. Favonian (talk) 09:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was already in the infobox, I just let it be seen. I assumed it was correct. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shahrah-e-Liaquat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual roads are almost never notable. Biographical information belongs on the article on the person in question (if notable), not on an article on a road named after them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am trying to bring order to the articles, templates and categories covering the system of government in Pakistan. The main article for this is now at Administrative units of Pakistan, where I have explained why that term is preferable. Different editors had different preferances, so that article has been moved back and forth between eight separate titles, but in the end I felt that the only correct term is the one the Pakistani government itself uses in official statistics. For example, the eight main articles on the administrative units of Pakistan were split between Category:Provinces and federally administered areas of Pakistan, Category:Provinces of Pakistan and Category:Subdivisions of Pakistan instead of all eight being in a single category. In certain cases, the particular category has had to be renamed because the administrative unit has been renamed. In each case all of the articles in those categories have now been recategorised:

• Category:Towns in Sindh had a single article which is now iin Category:Cities, towns and villages in Sindh
• Category:Towns in Pakistan had articles that really belonged in Category:Tehsils of Pakistan
• Category:Districts of Northern Areas, Pakistan and Category:Tehsils of Northern Areas (Pakistan) both referred to the Northern Areas of Pakistan, which were renamed recently as Gilgit-Baltistan. There are still a few of these categories which need new names.
• Category:Buildings of Pakistani government and Category:Government buildings in Pakistan cover the same area and there seems little point in having duplicate categories, so I moved the single article in Category:Buildings of Pakistani government to Category:Government buildings in Pakistan because of the better grammar.
• Category:Indian Paramilitary Forces is redundant to Category:Paramilitary forces of India which is a better title.
• Category:Constitutions of Pakistan was created to hold a single article, which could have easily gone under Category:Constitution of Pakistan
• Category:Talukas of Pakistan refers to a variant name for a unit of local government, also covered by Category:Local government in Pakistan
• Category:Provinces and federally administered areas of Pakistan, Category:Provinces of Pakistan, Category:Subdivisions of Pakistan, Category:Categories by province and territory of Pakistan, Category:History of subdivisions of Pakistan, Category:Former subdivisions of Pakistan, Category:Historic Regions of Pakistan, and Category:Historical regions of Pakistan all refer to existing or former administrative units of Pakistan and are now redundant to appropriately named categories. Green Giant (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Denso Hall, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kesc.com.pk/en/activity/community/culture/kesc-signs-mou-with-heritage-foundation-for-restoration-of-denso-hall-culture.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Denso Hall, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kesc.com.pk/en/activity/community/culture/kesc-signs-mou-with-heritage-foundation-for-restoration-of-denso-hall-culture.html and http://www.doodhpattiblogs.com/max-denso-hall-signposts-to-history/. As a copyright violation, Denso Hall appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Denso Hall has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Denso Hall and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Denso Hall with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Denso Hall.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Just to inform you, there is a Kutchi Wikipedia Test started. If you can assist in any way, please do.

http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/kfr

The article Arbab Alamgir Khan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://hafeezshaikh.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings AlphaGamma1991,

Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate this article into the unique and wonderful Kutchi language? please.

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Buddhism and Islam. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. The article basically has no unique content. If you want to work on it, consider asking an admin to move it to your userspace. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sargodha District. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neo^(T) 06:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Baitul Futuh is the largest mosque in Western Europe according to the reference, not the largest Ahmadi mosque in Western Europe. Thank You. Peaceworld111 (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss before making changes. Stop adding your own views about Ahmadiyya Peaceworld111 (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Peaceworld111

In the Baitul Futuh page it clearly states it is Ahmadiyya mosque. The Ahmadiyya mosques are not attended by "mainstream Muslims" (quoted from Ahmadiyya page). On 22 March 2010 [1] in Islam in the United Kingdom it stated that Baitul Futuh Mosque of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in London.Voted top 50 buildings in the world by Spectator magazine and it still does. In Religion in the United Kingdom, the version on 8 April 2010 [2] also had the same information but you changed it with edit [3] and dropping reference to of the “Ahmadiyya Muslim Community”, London.. How did this coversion from Ahmadiyya mosque to "mainstream Muslim" took place ? The London Central Mosque more representative of "mainstream Muslim". I hope you are also not stating that there 200 million Ahmadiyya as stated in the official website recently. AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, keep to the argument. I removed reference to 'Ahmadiyya' because you mentioned that it is not 'representative', only because you mentioned it. If Ahmadiyya mosques are not attended by mainstream muslims, not because ahmadis do not want them to come, but rather mainstream muslims do not want to come. What about shia, deobandi, brelwi - usually there is a similar divinde there. Moreover, often you see divide over by coountry of origin too. Arabs may have their own mosques, pakistanis, their own. In this sense no mosque would be representative. An image just gives a picture of a mosque, it doesn't tell us to whom it belongs and keeping in mind the fact that mosques are not shaped by who owns it, it doesn't matter which mosque image is put on. But why baitul futuh? Because it has much more of a character and is much more unique than london central mosque. Moreover, the image itself is of a better quality. Reference to '200m' is not part of the discussion here. Thank You. Peaceworld111 (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baitul Futuh is not a "mainstream Muslims" mosque and that is the crux of the issue. The Shia, Deobandi, Barelwi are considered part of "mainstream Muslims" as does by the constitution of Pakistan. Like you said and I quote Firstly, keep to the argument. The image is not the issue either and rest is just detail. AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an opinion of many mainstream muslims. Also there are other muslim sects, like shia who think that sunni are not true muslims and the list goes on... Should Wiki discrimnate against Ahmadis and adopt the opinion? Peaceworld111 (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sunni and Shia sects are "mainstream Muslims" as per 'Ahmadiyya' page and by the constitution of Pakistan. You are adding info about Ahmadiyya statistic in most "Islam in ..." pages and I don't see Sunni, Shia, Deobandi, Barelwi doing that. You are aslo trying to adding links to Ahmadiyya websites in Islam related pages and I don't see Sunni, Shia, Deobandi, Barelwi doing that. You wrote and I quote Should Wiki discrimnate against Ahmadis nobody is raising that issue. It is only that you should state the facts. If it is Ahmadiyya mosque then say it. If it is a link to Ahmadiyya website then state it. You dropped caption of Ahmadiyya mosque. Why all this deception ? AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I explained before the reason behind dropping the caption concerning Ahmadiyya, I can certainly put it back on, I do not mind.
• Secondly, what is wrong with adding information in Islam in... about Ahmadiyya? There are details about Sunni and Shia... aren't they in every Islam in... articles? After all Wiki is an Encyclopedia!
• Does it matter if Pakistani constitution says that Ahmadiyya are separate or not. Let Pakistan keep its opinion to itself. Wiki doesn't follow Pakistani rules and regulations or for that matter muslim's regulations.
• Links are added where there are articles related to it, as is the case with every other article!
• If removing an 'Ahmadiyya' mosque is not online discrimination, if removing details related to Ahmadiyya on Islam in... articles is not online discrimination, if labelling Ahmadiyya as non-muslim in Islam in Pakistan or Religion in Pakistan is not online discrimination then what is?
• You edited Baitul Futuh to Baitul Futuh Mosque. Largest Ahmedi mosque in Western Europe which is completely incorrect according to reference. I do not mind stating Baitul Futuh Mosque of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.Largest mosque in Western Europe This is correct, the only problem is that you will not find it representative. ThankYou Peaceworld111 (talk) 16:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bhanbhro. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanbhro. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

As a Sindhi speaker, would it be possible for you to join the sindhi wikipedia? It has very few members and little has been translated. Could you please help?

Thanks. --92.11.24.4 (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shopping in Karachi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.paktribune.com/pforums/posts.php?t=40537&start=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shopping in Karachi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Shopping in Karachi. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shopping in Karachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

This is for not using edit summaries even after being advised to do so.--Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 00:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this will help you break the habbit:

• Click on "My Preferences" at the top of the page---->Go to the "Editing" tab---->Check the "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary".

Happy editing!--Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 00:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the material you included in Shopping in Karachi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Further, when copying material from other wikipedia articles, such as you have done with Market, Bazaar and others, you must provide attribution from the other articles as described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]