User talk:72.1.195.4/Archive01

This is an archive. Please leave messages at User talk:72.1.195.4. Thanks.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Academic Challenger 21:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Johnleemk | Talk 15:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Raymond Samuels, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fightindaman 23:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not blank half a page. I'm surprised your not blocked yet, but LAST WARNING. Whopper 18:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of billionaires on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 18:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to J. Philippe Rushton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 16:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for helping with the Rushton article - looks like you got pinged by someone for vandalism by accident - you should probably do yourself a favor and create an account so you won't get hit like that. --JereKrischel 16:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your edits to the Rushton article. I would appreciate it if you would focus on the changes you intend to make, and avoid reverting entire sections with out-dated versions because of one dispute. I know together we can make this article well-balanced and NPOV, but it will take longer if we don't try to work with eachother! Please let me know either on my talk page, or on the Rushton talk page, if there are particular sections you have issues with, and we can work together to draft something appropriate. --JereKrischel 18:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we've still got more back and forth to do on the Rushton article - thank you for your patience! Again, I suggest that you create yourself an account rather than just go by your IP address.

A couple of notes:

1) I think our "faulty syllogisms" probably should be deleted - neither represents what the other side intends - but if you'd like to keep them I understand.;

2) On genetic differences PC analysis forming clusters does not directly speak to absolute genetic similarity/difference. Red herring, got removed.

3) Moved the professional opinion down to the appropriate section;

4) We need to simplify the description of his theory - rewriting his book in the section doesn't really provide what we should be trying to provide as an encylopedia - a concise overview. Are there specific bits that you feel are must have, that I've pruned? Maybe we can add them in one at a time?

Thanks again for your help, please let me know on my talk page, or on the talk page for the Rushton article if you have more concerns! --JereKrischel 17:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to World Wrestling Entertainment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Glenn Beck (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 19:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Misza13 19:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Cell (biology), you will be blocked. Figma 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Michael Coren. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. delldot talk 15:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. You can't add unsourced material that attacks a person. If you re-add the material without a source you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's no good putiing the sources on my talk page. The sources must be in the article. Look at this wher I removed the material. There were no sources in the material that you added and in fact some of it looks like opinion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Th external link that you added has nothing to do with tigers. If you look at the article there is also an Wikipedia link to Siegfried and Roy but there is no external link to thier site. The external links should be relevant to the article. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the time to read Wikipedia:External links. The ones that apply here are Wikipedia:External links#What to link, the context is lacking, and Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided, #1 and #14 in the list. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THe link was removed because it's not relevant to white tigers. It's about white lions and adds nothing to the article. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let everyone know: This is a library IP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk • contribs) 12:57, 1 October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to White tiger, you will be blocked from editing. sohmc 15:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The information you added to White tiger might be accurate but that is not enough. Information in Wikipedia should be verifiable through references to reliable sources. Without references an independent reader cannot verify that the information is correct. Unverifiable information is likely to be deleted because it cannot be distinguished from vandalism.

If the information you want to add is accurate, then you should be able to find elsewhere on the web, a newspaper article or some other reliable source that you can add as a citation to demonstrate that your information is correct. If you need help on how to format a reference then please ask.

You might also find it useful to leave a message on the talk page of the editor who has deleted your material as being unsourced. He can explain his reasons for deleting the material and the two of you can discuss how to provide reliable references to support your material. Sbowers3 17:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said that you used the Wikipeida Cat article for a reference and that's the problem. Wikipedia is not a relilable source. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link is Reliability of Wikipedia. If the original source was given in another article then it could also be quoted in white tiger. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was User:Averette as can be seen here. By the way if you use four ~~~~ it will give your signature and date/time stamp. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. I'll try and fix up the references so they are inline citations. But I'll need a bit of help. You'll need to tell me which publications you are referring to with the following:

• Sankhala 1976
• Gee 1964

The rest of them are obvious from the list at the bottom in the references section. Those two are the only ones I'm not sure of. Give me a while and I'll get the others in. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry for my edit. Please accept my apology. Oda Mari (talk) 04:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be because I was working on fixing the references and didn't think about removing the tag. I've done it now. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Crandon Park bit would have been me. I didn't notice that she died before the zoo was moved. Thanks for the kind words and thanks for finding all the references. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Entered the reference. Looking good there. Thanks for all your work. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at that. It could do with some references and you might know which ones to use. THanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:72. I've noticed you seem to know quite a bit about animals. Have you ever considered creating an account here on Wikipedia? It's quite easy, and if anybody ever vandalizes Wikipedia from the library you use, you won't have to risk getting in trouble for it. (I'm a big lover of hippos. I've done a lot of work on the hippo articles, but I didn't know about Eisenhower's pygmy hippo! That's so cool!) Anyways, if you decide you want to create an account I'd be happy to help you get started. --JayHenry 21:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 16:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Thanks. There is I think a Golden tabby article as well.

To contact JayHenry (or any user that does not have a talk link) is just to click on the blue link they provide to their user page and then click on the "discussion" tab near the top. Here's the direct link to his talk page User talk:JayHenry. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I left JayHenry a message at User talk:JayHenry#User talk:72.1.195.4. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've left him a message about the hippo. As for the tiger/golden tabby you would need a source for the information.

By the way. Most of the messages that was at the top didn't seem to apply right now so I moved it into an archive. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this what you were looking for? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that JayHEnry hasn't edited since you left the message. Is it possible to get your friend to register an account so they could upload the pictures? I will check through the white tiger references in a while when I have some more time. Just off to work. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at a 1986 US dictionary I found that they only had the Indo-Chinese spelling. A secondary source, WordWeb Pro, give both spellings. I did notice that both dictionaries define the word as "relating to Indochina. I also noticed that MS Word will accept both spellings in either UK or US English. I guess it's just a variant and either one is correct. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cut down the triva and converted it into prose. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows why people do that. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you see stuff like that with no sources don't bother trying to look for them. Just remove it right away as it's a violation of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, which says "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space." If it's true then it's up to the person adding it to source it. If they continue to re-add it then either let a administrator know or better make a report at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you got to [1] and then look at the bottom it shows various things that you can check. One of these is http://samspade.org/whois/125.237.34.205 which shows Auckland. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now you are asking things that are beyond my technical knowledge. I suppose it's possible but I'm not sure. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should create an account. Take a look at Help:Logging in. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's important to remember not to put any of his information on Wikipedia. You are right though if the material has already been published then it's OK fro it to be in the article. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Off-the-grid (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or YouTube/Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 01:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2 was changed by 72.1.195.4 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-12T01:00:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Danish language, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Gwernol 00:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Six-Day War, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 23:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Erica Campbell. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Don't ignore WP:Verifiability's "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" simply because you think primary sources should be used instead. Vinh1313 (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gloucester Rangers has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. PeterCantropus (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could check with them about that. It might be usable but they would let you know. I was looking at the amount of vandalism but it's not a lot compared with some articles. If it gets worse then it could be protected. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you upload the image? CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 21:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably nobody noticed it. Some things can sit for a long time without being noticed. This happens if the change is made and then followed by a number of edits (vandalism) that get reverted by a vandal fighter with no knowledge of the article. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you need to log in and upload the picture because you are the one that got the required information. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]