Talk:Warner Bros. Pictures Animation

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Warner Bros. Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Scoob!#Future|Scoob! Holiday Haunt]] The anchor (#Future) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Teen Titans Go! To the Movies

Is Teen Titans Go! To the Movies a Warner Animation Group film? The trailer for the film does not feature the WAG logo, and the source that lists the movie does not specifically say Warner Animation Group. 50.50.122.181 (talk) 02:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super Pets

An IP editor has been repeatedly deleting information about the DC Super Pets project without stating a reason. I invite them to give a reason here. Their edits are apt to continue being undone if that is not done. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist blocked 2605:6000:1609:C17F:F1FA:EE63:B7C:D36B, and 2605:6000:1609:C17F:21E8:7288:5A6A:4B2A evaded that block, so I did a short range block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having taken care of the problem editor, we're left with a question: is this film actually a WAG film? Neither of the sources we use for it say so, so it seems possible that it could be handled elsewhere, as Teen Titans Go! to the Movies was. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult to find solid information on upcoming films. Sometimes trade magazines will track this stuff. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking that information, should it be included? (Does anyone have IMDb Pro access?) --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The IMDb is not a reliable source. It's user-generated – including the paywalled content. On the other hand, sometimes industry professionals update the IMDb, so it can be useful in finding leads. If we can't find a source, I guess we should remove this entry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2019

This edit request to Warner Animation Group has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

97.91.249.130 (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Traditional-Animation Department Of Warner Bros. Feature Animation In 2003, Warner Bros. Released Animated Films, The Features Including: Clifford's Really Big Movie, You-Gi-Oh! The Movie: Pyramid Of Light, The Polar Express, Corpse Bride, The Ant Bully, Happy Feet, TMNT, Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Legend Of The Guardians: The Owl's Of Ga'hoole, And Happy Feet Two.

Not done: It's not clear what changes you want to made, please also provide reliable sources. Masum Reza^📞 15:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The filmography of WAG and why does it have a separate "List of..." filmography

I have to question the fact that WAG has its own "List of... films" article, when it's not big enough to deserve it. Also, the filmography section in this article already gives everything. Also, the "List of..." article doesn't mention the shorts at all.

I know, maybe this is the wrong place to ask. But what should be done? And if I want to do it, then how?

Sorry for bothering you all and wasting your time... Andrei Bondoc (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Animation/Live Action

Could we try to hold a distinction between the Lego movies and Tom & Jerry? The Lego projects were mostly full animation with some live action sequences a la SpongeBob movies, while Tom & Jerry was a completely live action movie that incorporated animated character a la Who Framed Roger Rabbit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:6C01:F33F:9189:655D:DFE6:77CE (talk) 04:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No support for the proposal. Number 5 7 23:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Animation Group → Warner Bros. Feature Animation – The studio was renamed in a reorganization in a recent article revealed in Variety. The page should be moved to the old page under that name.^[1]

References

^ Donnelly, Matt (June 1, 2022). "David Zaslav Outlines Major Warner Bros. Film Overhaul, Addresses Toby Emmerich Exit". Variety. Variety. Retrieved June 3, 2022.

– Adamtb24 (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

This makes no sense. There is absolutely no information on the Variety article that Warner Animation Group is going to be renamed to Warner Bros. Feature Animation, as the "Warner Animation Group" is still used today. The Warner Animation Group name and logo are still used. Warner Bros. Feature Animation (1994-2004) is the successor to Warner Animation Group. The Variety article just called it "Warner Bros. Feature Animation" without the information that Warner Animation Group will be renamed. With the case of that studio, it still uses the Warner Animation Group name. VictorPinas17 (talk) 04:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT rename and move Warner Animation Group to Warner Bros. Feature Animation. VictorPinas17 (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, overall, we should not rename "Warner Animation Group" to "Warner Bros. Feature Animation". VictorPinas17 (talk) 07:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This will never happen! Because Warner Animation Group will not be renamed to Warner Bros. Feature Animation. VictorPinas17 (talk) 09:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with VictorPinas17 here, they did not announce anything about the name change 98.110.169.16 (talk) 02:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He's right. So we will NOT move the Warner Animation Group page to the Warner Bros. Feature Animation page. So please let me remove the box that says this:

"A request that this article title be changed to Warner Bros. Feature Animation is under discussion. Please do not move this article until the discussion is closed." VictorPinas17 (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's called "Warner Animation Group" and it's the successor of Warner Bros. Feature Animation, and it STAYS THAT WAY! VictorPinas17 (talk) 04:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VictorPinas17: You stated your opposition six times, which is five times more than necessary. Please take a look at WP:BLUDGEON. Also, please do not remove the requested move notice from the article -- as long as this requested move discussion is open, a bot will automatically re-add it to the page even if you try to remove it manually, so you're just wasting your time. At some point, an uninvolved editor will close this requested move ~~and~~ the notice on the article will be removed permanently. Please be patient until then. Aoi (青い) (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC) edited 20:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly Oppose. No other source can be found (aside from a internet forum and a tweet, both of which are unreliable anyway) that says anything about this name change (not even the source you added in mentions anything about a name change too), and it could probably be a legal name for WAG for all we know. Plus, WBFA is the predecessor to this company so that makes no sense what so ever. CB (talk) 11:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 9 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moved by Davematt630, and this can be a little early per WP:SNOW. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 03:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Animation Group → Warner Bros. Pictures Animation – Warner Animation Group was renamed to Warner Bros. Pictures Animation.^[1]

References

^ https://deadline.com/2023/06/warner-bros-animation-bill-damaschke-flintstones-1235412865/

Hekadrive (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that article is already changed. LancedSoul (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hekadrive, @LancedSoul: I have reverted the undiscussed move due to the presence of the prior discussion, and have fixed this requested move discussion. – robertsky (talk) 05:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Source already indicated that, also confirmed by the article about its first deal with Locksmith Animation. (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warner-bros-pictures-animation-inks-230723687.html) 125.167.57.192 (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per reliable sources. The animation company name is official. LancedSoul (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The name change is supported by multiple reliable sources and confirmed by Warner themselves. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The rebrand is official and confirmed by the company itself, thus justifying the move. 1.64.193.74 (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support and suggest WP:SNOW close. RMXY (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so, are we set to rename? Jstewart2007 (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jstewart2007: Sure, unless you are non-admin page mover, with the page move of it needs to be unprotected first. This consensus is unanimous. 180.245.215.25 (talk) 00:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you close a conversation? The conversation has to close in order to move the page. I’m kind of new to editing Wikipedia articles, since I just started six months ago. Jstewart2007 (talk) 02:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussions are typically left open for a full week before closing. This is not a requirement, but it is common practice. -2pou (talk) 07:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Warner Bros. Pictures Animation's Truckers

Truckers is a 2024 American–British computer-animated fantasy film based on The Nome Trilogy book series. 92.40.213.33 (talk) 07:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Animation Group's Co–Produced by Aardman Animations

Uh Oh No Canada (2015) and The PJs Movie (2023) 92.40.213.33 (talk) 08:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of updates for future films

Apparently there have been no more updates on upcoming WBPA films due to Warner Bros. Pictures focusing on live-action films. Is there WP:NORUSH for more reliable sources? The Media Expert (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have to be patient until there are sources posting official updates for upcoming WBPA films. The Media Expert (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Donnelly, Matt (June 1, 2022). "David Zaslav Outlines Major Warner Bros. Film Overhaul, Addresses Toby Emmerich Exit". Variety. Variety. Retrieved June 3, 2022.

[Deadline_Article-2] ttps://deadline.com/2023/06/warner-bros-animation-bill-damaschke-flintstones-1235412865/

[1]