Jump to content

Talk:WLTZ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WLTZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:WLTZ/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 20:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

[edit]

Earwig says good to go. Quotations used—rarely—are in-line with WP:COPYQUOTE and only very short extracts.

Files

[edit]

All images relevant and free:

  • File:WLTZ Local NBC 38 logo.png: good, valid non-free rationale;
  • File:Wltz dt2 2010.png: good, valid public domain rationale;
  • File:AFLAC Tower Columbus Georgia.jpg: good, CC-BY-SA 3.0, uploaded to Commons by registered user.

Prose

[edit]
  • I doubt the first ref in the lead is necessary, given its cited elsewhere and the lead has no other citations.
  • "section of East Columbus (postal address is actually Buena Vista Road in Columbus)" – maybe convert this into an efn note?
  • "three groups applied for television stations in Columbus," – wikilink Columbus as first mention in the body; likewise:
  • First mentions of ABC and NBC should also be wikilinked.
  • The sentence starting "WYEA-TV would prove to be a challenge as the group's first property," reads a bit too long for me. Perhaps it is possible to add a full stop somewhere?
  • "However, many of these changes were later trimmed back for economic reasons by Lewis." – is economic reasons the right word? Also:
  • Lewis is only first mentioned later in the article.
  • "By the start of 1981, American Family owned six stations, WYEA-TV and five outlets in larger markets" – recommend replacing the last comma with an em dash for better flow.
  • "beginning to brand as "Z-38"," – recommend "beginning to brand itself as "Z-38",".
  • "the station briefly had the first Black anchor on Columbus television," do the sources have a date for when this was? Seems noteworthy if possible.
  • "anchor Suzanne Hudson said the news was "like taking a knife to our throat" and left her "absolutely floored"." – is this relevant? It reads a bit too much like a news article quoting a miscellaneous anchor.
  • "In 2012, the station restored local news production from Columbus." – pretty short, I would merge this into the above paragraph.

Refs

[edit]

All sources are RS. Passes spotcheck. No concerns with refs 1, 5, 12, 22, 30 or 39.

  • Ref 39 is missing a date.
  • Ref 41: I believe "wltz.com" should be "WLTZ"?

Other

[edit]

Infobox, navs, cats and other templates all good.

  • Recommend adding template:Use X English.
  • Could "alt=Refer to caption" be improved? Even just saying "a skyscraper with blue letters "Aflac", the l obstructed by a duck, at its top left" etc. should work.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 21:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WLTZ&oldid=1206065746"