Talk:Vrak

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of VRAK.TV from the French Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors.

To give more info to this article, check out the VRAK.TV article on the French Wikipedia. Anyone who is able to translate this info and add useful info to this article would be greatly appreciated. This is also can be done with other television channels becuase it seems that the info on the French Wikipedia about french language television channels give a lot more in-depth info then it does on the English Wikipedia. Others I've noticed have been Historia, MusiquePlus, MusiMax, and others. So checking out the french Wikipedia and using some info that has been added to those articles can greatly improve the articles here on the english wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.198.108.51 (talk)

Done, for the most part. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 01:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TVJQ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment I am removing the text in the article which refers to and applies that TVJQ and Canal Famille/VRAK.TV was the same channel. ie, TVJQ just rebranded as Canal Famille, which is not the case. I have found the original CRTC license for Canal Famille, which proves that TVJQ must have been licensed before and TVJQ and Canal Famille must have used separate licenses which means they are different channels. So there really should be a separate article for TVJQ because Canal Famille and TVJQ were separate channels, not the same. MusiMax (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And btw, here is the original broadcast license for Canal Famille: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/1992/..%5C..%5CDecisions%5C1987%5CDB87-896.htm MusiMax (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that precision. If I have time, and resources, I'll try to create the page (at least, the start). --Jimmy James Lavoie (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed VRAK.TV to know what was the current slogan of the channel. That's the answer I got:

Original message

Translated message

I've seen from many sources that VRAK is closing, on the 1st of October (https://www.ledevoir.com/culture/ecrans/796475/c-est-la-fin-pour-vrak, https://www.iheartradio.ca/rouge-fm/rouge-fm-drummondville/nouvelles/fin-des-emissions-pour-vrak-apres-23-ans-1.20139779, https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2023/08/18/bell-media-met-fin-a-la-chaine-vrak) so should the article be updated? 102.217.7.74 (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]