Talk:Ver sacrum

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somebody has changed the date of publication of the dictionary to 1975. Why?Aldrasto (talk) 11:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The last section on the Roman ver sacrum is very unbalanced. It devotes much more attention to Dumézil's theory on the founding, and one sentence on the instance of the ver sacrum that is most solidly attested for the historical era. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]