Talk:The Raj Quartet

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012.

I'm surprised that no one has used the works of Shelley Reece, the one academic who has published work on both this novel and Paul Scott. (I took a class from him in the 1980s, but when Jewel in the Crown was broadcast on PBS, the local paper had an article on him which asserted this.) -- llywrch (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The criticism by Salman Rushdie is just ridiculous. It's quite obvious that the man may have heard about the Raj Quartet, but he certainly didn't read it.