Talk:The Pirate Movie

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Australian / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Gilbert and Sullivan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gilbert and Sullivan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gilbert and SullivanWikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanTemplate:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanGilbert and Sullivan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance The Pirate Movie is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

There has been a debate going on about this film ever since it's release: Is this the worst musical ever made?

The only good thing I gave it was the opening title song -- it was good.

--Jason Palpatine 08:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took it to be more of a parody of musicals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its hardly a parody, its a really bad rehash of The Pirates of Penzance but removing some songs, adding others, and changing the story/characters. TR 11:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Wikipedia is really the place to open up a "debate", but I for one thought it was an excellent summer movie (for a "tween"). Adults only see the cheese-factor, but if you watch closely, you'll see it's a film that's full of very clever visual and verbal jokes. It's good for a good laugh. I would never call it the "worst musical". It's a parody, for pete's sake! If the makers of "Scary Movie" made one that was a musical, would it also be instantly considered one of the "worst musicals"? The Pirate Movie had some VERY good songs ("Pumpin' & Blowin'" NOT being one of them) and should be recognized as such. It was just a fun summer movie, and I loved it growing up. --Schmendrick (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is an interesting (though anecdotal) fact which my personal experience confirms: those who watch this film as children generally enjoy it when they see it again as adults; those who first watch it as adults generally think it dire and avoid it thereafter. I would say that if you haven't seen it by the time you are 16, don't bother. Schmendrick is right when he says that it's a film that's full of very clever visual and verbal jokes but that is part of the pantomimic quality which appeals to youngsters far more than to oldsters. Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder! -- 68.147.195.106 (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On my Worst Film list. TunaSushi (talk) 04:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list of songs includes "Happy Ending" (in two versions, cast and instrumental).

The list of Golden Raspberry nominations includes "Happy Endings" for worst song.

Which is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.48.239 (talk) 06:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What can be done about a user that keeps adding references to a Luke Strotz and Captain Coleslaw in several pages of obscure movies in wikipedia? Many of the time it's hard to tell from a real reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&ns0=1&redirs=1&search=luke+strotz&limit=100&offset=0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/203.45.37.218

-- mauriciomoura (talk) 12:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the "soundtrack album" listing is divided into four parts (A, B, C and D) and is not particularly chronological. Was this list derived from an 8-track tape cassette? Of course, that's an extinct format that quartered the playlist primarily to get the total lengths to fit four parallel tracks, with other considerations secondary. Somehow, that would be appropriate for this film. WHPratt (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The track listing is derived from the 2-LP vinyl release, which was arranged in the same order as the cassette version (that was split onto two sides instead of four). I don't believe there was an 8-track (the format was on its last legs by that point), but I might be wrong. The songs were put into their proper order on some of the bootleg CDs. The album has never official been re-released in any format. 65.255.86.46 (talk) 00:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Two LPs! That's interesting. WHPratt (talk) 01:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that at the time I asked the question, the "soundtrack album" item presented the tracks without any explanation. Somewhere along the way, the section was expanded. WHPratt (talk) 22:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Trivia" section is absolutely horrendous! It's pretty much just a pile of horribly-written, haphazardly-listed details about the scenes filmed in Werribee Park Mansion, with a couple of bloopers inserted in the list too. I gave up after trying to fix a few lines. This should probably just be split up into two sections: a paragraph or two on Werribee Park Mansion, and known bloopers. - WillieBlues (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and moved the relevant Werribee Park Mansion info to the "locations" section, and deleted the stuff that looked redundant or irrelevant to the movie. I'm wondering if the illiterate user who inserted all of this is some Werribee Park Mansion employee. - WillieBlues (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for integrating the useful parts out of the trivia section and removing all the useless detail. The remaining two items are just not worth having in an article so I've axed them too. Cheers! -- Whpq (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Pirate Movie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1982/1982st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody left a reference to the album reaching #39 on the Australian charts, but it seems to be from a book that's not online. I can't find any information for how the three singles fared in Australia. If somebody else can dig that info up, it'd be appreciated. 65.255.86.46 (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]