Talk:Reality Checkpoint

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled [notability issues]

GA removed, no ref, not encyclopedically written, misses on loads of account. Lincher 18:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is fiction and should be deleted. The lamp post is not known by this name. Someone scratching words on a lamp postis evidence of nothing.

In fact, the lamp post is referred to as the reality checkpoint. But I agree that the article needs sourcing. Bluap 15:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can also confirm the lamp post is called this and I have been aware of the inscription on it since about 1979. Ben Finn 23:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry, can't be bothered digging my old login details out...) Reality Checkpoint is one of those Cambridge place names, like Four Lamps and Mitcham's Corner, you won't find on any official map but is widely known amongst the local population. Any local taxi driver would be able to take you there (well, close to it as it's in the middle of a park.) It definitely predates my 14 years in the area. I'd be very surprised if it hadn't had some serious work written about it, however it has made it into print at least once: [1]. The Beeb have mentioned it too: [2] Just another bit of local folklore... do something once round here and the porters clean up after you. Do it twice and it's tradition. --db

I learned of 'Reality Checkpoint' in the application literature for new undergraduates I received before coming up to Cambridge around 1976. It had a very nice black and white photo of the graffiti scratched into the black-paint. Can't remember the publication. Madir 10:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Reality Checkpoint really worthy of it's own article? It seems to me that it should be merged with the Parker's Piece - it's not really significant by it's own merit alone. Shockeroo 13:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Reality Checkpoint was there in 1973. I once used it, during daylight and while sober, to check which way I was going during thick fog. Of course I already knew that the inscription was on the south side of the lamppost, otherwise it would have been useless. Maproom (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article

There are three main theories of the name....but four are listed? Does anyone know which is the spurious one? --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scribblin' Simon (talk • contribs) 13:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the section was sourced, we could look it up and find out. >_> --_{tiny plastic} Grey Knight ⊖ 13:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I heard this theory: It's the start and finish point for Mescaline Run-outs. A group of you meet at Reality Checkpoint, do some mescaline and all walk off in different directions. When each person reaches the edge of town you turn round, come back to Reality Checkpoint and compare experiences.

It's not just "some students" that know this lamppost as the Reality Checkpoint, but I'd argue the large majority of Cambridge residents. That's speculation of course, but the Reality Checkpoint has given its name to a book by Peter Turnbull (as linked above) and to the latest album by Drum and Base artist Logistics (who comes from Cambridge). I'd like to argue that the article should stay because the lamppost has cultural significance that goes beyond local folklore. But I do agree that the article needs improving - I'll try and clean it up a bit. Buffalo gill (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAM Magazine

There's an article on Reality Checkpoint in issue 57 of CAM magazine. At the time of writing this issue doesn't appear to be on their website [3] - as soon as it is I'll add a link. --Mattmm (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grade II listed

It's already in the category, but not mentioned in the article. if you want to source it, then... here's as good a source as you can possibly get - JVG (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of the name

Only the first explanation has a reference. The others have no reference to the explanation. Perhaps these could be found, or the explanations removed. Leutha (talk) 16:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Reality Checkpoint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110716063034/http://www.alumni.cam.ac.uk/uploads/File/CAM57/Cam57.pdf to http://www.alumni.cam.ac.uk/uploads/File/CAM57/Cam57.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Reality Checkpoint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reality Checkpoint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]