Talk:Pain in babies

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Neuroscience This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Good topic but the articles needs a rewrite to bring into compliance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Currently the articles reads as an essay rather than an encyclopedia article based on reliable sources. Some of sources look very good so I do think there is enough material for the article. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 19:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup. Hopefully removed most of the "essay-ness". --Haruth (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. Anthony (talk) 11:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Anthony. Appreciate you taking the time. :) Best wishes. --Haruth (talk) 11:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from the Pain talk page:

Pain in babies appears to have been imported from Citizendium, which may introduce copyright issues. Perhaps even more importantly, it is an under-cited, over-simplified essay. I think the best thing to do with it is to merge the verifiable parts into this article. In particular, I think that the diagnosis and management of pain in pediatric patients is highly suitable subject, and that the historical changes in professional views of physical pain in neonates is valuable here. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The licenses used by Citizendium and Wikipedia are compatible. They can freely exchange content, all that's needed is that the articles be linked. See Template:Citizendium for more info. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion is continued on the Pain talk page. Anthony (talk) 03:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this. "For a limited time, this title is open to the public in a free trial period." Anthony (talk) 02:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a world, from a French man with a poor English to tell you, thank you.

All over the world, before the 5 April 2010, it seam's that nobody have never talk about this subject on wikipedia. The reason is a part of this subject, the same that make this invisible to the science until 1987 and the work of Kanwaljeet S. Anand.

It's not easy to talk about this, it's not an usual capacity of the human being, all the facts, the historical fact of this subject tell us that every body have the eyes deeply closed when pain in babies appear somewhere. To hard to see.

It is the reason why I want to tell here thank you, to TakuyaMurata the first human all aver the word who have made the effort to talk about that on wikipédia, and the others who have work to make this job compatible with the encyclopedia.

It steel hard to see, but easiest to find for those how work on this way, like me when I've work on the French one. It's not a translation, but to see that about 10 person before me have work on it make me know that it's possible ... possible to find somebody like Haruth who say (on this page), something like "yes good job, we have to work on it".

It was not easy for Anand and many others to talk about those thing, those pioneer have open a risky way. I've read a French book on it and I Know that it was risky because of the defense of those who don't want to see, very hight defense to have keep this subject out of the science until 1987, out of wikipedia until 2010. No?

So thank you for the knowledge of humanity, and for the humanity of the knowledge. ;) --Smily (talk) 08:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My view is that this draft ought to be merged into this article rather than be accepted as a freestanding article, and I have suggested so as has a prior reviewer. Over to content experts here Fiddle Faddle 18:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pain in babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080601044349/http://academic.sun.ac.za/medphys/Life19.html to http://academic.sun.ac.za/medphys/Life19.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050103043713/http://www.pediadol.org/article-imprim.php3?id_article=430 to http://www.pediadol.org/article-imprim.php3?id_article=430

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that this article be renamed "Pain in Infants" since that uses more scientific terms. BallyTheDog (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]