Talk:M90 motorway

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland: Transport in Scotland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as High-importance). UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Highways: United Kingdom High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

This statement has no fact to back it up: "The M90 also has the tightest corner on the UK motorway network, for which traffic is forced to slow." The corner is tighter than the design standards hence why it is signed with "chevrons" and "bend" signs, however it can be easily taken at 70mph and I have seen cars regularly take the corner at 90mph - I appreciate this information has no factual base however.

Is it definitely the tightest corner on the network? There are 2 tight corners on the M80 Stepps bypass, one is near the temporary terminus at J3 and the other where it passes under the railway bridge between J1 and J2. Both are subject to a 50mph limit and the forces feel far greater at 50mph than the M90 corner at 70mph.161.12.7.4 10:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M90 motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725093503/http://www.ciht.org.uk/motorway/m90inveperth.htm to http://www.ciht.org.uk/motorway/m90inveperth.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M90 motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029092623/http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/system/files/images/projects/Forth%20Replacement%20Crossing/FRC_bus_lane_map.jpg to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/system/files/images/projects/Forth%20Replacement%20Crossing/FRC_bus_lane_map.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150406123806/http://andrum99.blogspot.com/2012/11/scotland-gets-its-first-managed-motorway.html to http://andrum99.blogspot.com/2012/11/scotland-gets-its-first-managed-motorway.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607093856/http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/news/FRC-junction-early-and-under-budget to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/news/FRC-junction-early-and-under-budget

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]