Talk:Little Yosemite Valley

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Geography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs

Thanks to the nice expansion by the anon editor, this article has potential to be a "Did You Know" link on the front page for 6 hours. To be ready for that, I think this article needs:

1. More references : there are plenty of facts in this article (e.g., geographic locations of features), but not that many inline citations. I think we should add more supporting references.
2. Better formatting: The use of {{-}}, while completely permitted, makes the article look unlike other WP articles, with extra white space. The images have unusual sizes, also.
3. Fewer photographs: Photographs are supposed to support the text. There are probably too many images: I can transwiki the excess to Commons.

I'm happy to edit the article to make it ready for DYK nomination: I just wanted to let other editors know what I was thinking of. —hike395 (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After some discussion, anon editor and I decided that he/she should develop the article further and not nominate it for DYK. —hike395 (talk) 05:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]