Talk:Language/action perspective

This is a first stab at content. A better approach might be to define the LAP, to describe applications, and finally to discuss implications thereof (such as the influence on the AI Winter, relationship to John Searle's work, etc.). jmswtlk 12:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about Action Workflow (may be TM)?

The text "Yet, these LAP successes have not found entry into the wider stream of applications." is not IMO correct. That 'entry', and considerable penetration, is Action Workflow.

[Note 'ActionWorkflow' (no spaces) is claimed as a TM in the abstract section of this seminal 1992 paper [1] and is/was a named product of the company sponsoring that paper. 'Action Workflow' (with a space) refers more broadly to the concepts embodying or derived from the LAP view of workflow.]

Here's just one modern (2000) example [2] which begins "The goal of this paper is a reassessment of the Action Workflow approach, a well-known application of the Language Action Perspective (LAP)" [quoted under the fair use doctrine].

I came here because Action Workflow has no Wikipedia page. Really surprised there is no mention of Action Workflow here. Ideally it would have its own page, and be linked from here, but we have to start somewhere.

I find many Google hits for 'Action Workflow' both within Wikipedia and externally, but the work seems fragmented and related to specific toolsets with no emerging web based centre of excellence. Seems ideal for a wiki entry. Unfortunately I've done nothing in this area since 1994, so I will help, but I don't yet feel able to lead.

Duncan (noob editor)

As it says above, this was a first attempt to support the AI winter page.

By all means, add 'Action Workflow' to the content. Winograd references ActionWorkflow on his page without a TM.

The quote about 'mainstream' comes from the LAP 2004 conference. I had the wrong year. I've read two papers with essentially this theme. This ought to be a separate section, after a better introductory section.

Also, given all the recent attention we see with the Semantic web, perhaps something about that ought to be added here. jmswtlk 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm really noob. Forgot to sign my earlier comment. Sorry, Duncan Shannock9 (talk) 20:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link http://bookshelved.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UnderstandingComputersAndCognition leads to a 404 error Klamma (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Language/action perspective. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]