Talk:Iwaidja language

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Mid‑importance Iwaidja language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Where does "ɺ" come from? Evans uses a different symbol (an l-hacek), and same for the other flaps? Surely he did that for a reason? But I haven't seen Pym and Larrimore's papers, is it used there? Edricson 09:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is just IPA transcription. Evans used the hacek as a poor-man's substitute for the breve, which is the diacritic used to derive flaps missing from the IPA. Since the IPA is missing two out of three symbols he needs, he just used breves (haceks) across the board. But these don't sit well on laterals with their ascenders, which he finds annoying himself. Here we've tried to stick as close as possible to the IPA; the alveolar aleady exists, the retroflex will be included in SIL next edition of fonts, and the palatal, which Evans isn't sure is phonemic, has the breve inverted under the letter per recommendation of SIL's font designers. (Since the retroflex has both an ascender and a descender, the breve doesn't fit at either end.) kwami 09:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the flapped laterals are not the sounds your transcriptions imply. These articulations bear little resemblance to the lateral flaps described as occurring in languages such as Naasioi, Tucano, Chumburung and some dialects of Korean and Japanese. Acoustic and electropalatographic data show that they can best be described as a sequence of a strongly articulated lateral approximant (i.e with greater contact area than a simple lateral approximant) followed by a lightly articulated and rapidly released oral stop or flap (i.e. with less contact than a simple stop and often with incomplete closure). We have done electropalatographic work on these sounds last year, and will be publishing something soon. I am writing a PhD thesis on the prosodic structure of Iwaidja, and am in a position to update the information in this entry, when I get time. Meanwhile, the transcription we recommend is simple l and retroflex l followed in each case by superscore d. Brucebirch (talk) 07:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be wonderful.

Do you mean a superscript dee, /l^d/? kwami (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iwaidja language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070914014759/http://www.mpi.nl/DOBES/projects/iwaidja/languages/view?searchterm=Iwaidja to http://www.mpi.nl/DOBES/projects/iwaidja/languages/view?searchterm=Iwaidja

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]