Talk:Invasion stripes

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Military history: Aviation / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force World War II task force

Not included in this artical. 76.179.164.79 (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what you really should do is to include all the similar markings used for same purpose ie HIGHLY VISIBLE 'IFF PAINTINGS/MARKINGS', as the ones used by Germany ie "HOME DEFENCE" and "EASTERn FRONT" 'stripes' or 'markings' whatever pleases you and also Soviets have used the same on ground vehiles so on.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.195.225 (talk) 00:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is called 'Invasion stripes' and refers mainly to the black-and-white stripes painted on allied aircraft for the Normandy Invasion. If you want to create an article on generic 'Recognition markings' than feel free to start one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.86.52 (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In context of current article I think that Z symbol should still stand, but agree with this comment that recognition markings could be split into a seperate article. Currently on Czchekoslovakia and Ukraine would be part of it, if someone wants to point me in the direction of additional information I would be happy to create/split the articles.

Asimoth (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that at the end of the article it links the Z symbol to the Eastern Military District, should it not be the Western district? The Z is for ‘zapad’ (запад) meaning west and the V for ‘Vostok’ (восток) meaning east! I could be wrong though! 2A00:23C8:5512:FB01:401B:9F8:D23A:84E9 (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content cut as 'not invasion stripes,' notably from Russian invasions in Czechoslovakia and Ukraine have been restored to Identification friend or foe under a new heading for low tech systems. I may edit the heading to highly visible painted markings, or something similar. I would still argue that if you want to cut Czech and Ukraine you should cut everything from the cold war as well, as invasion stripes specifically referred to the D-Day invasion.

Asimoth (talk) 02:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]