Talk:Heinrich Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I've been watching this article develop from an idea and a stub into a very nice article, and most recently offered extensive comments during the WikiProject Military History peer review, preparatory to the GA nom. Certainly this is GA quality, and I'm happy to promote it. Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]