Talk:Governor of Massachusetts

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Massachusetts / Governors Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Mid-importance).

In the Box on the right of the page, shouldn't the Governor's style be "His Excellency," and not "The Honorable" as it states in the Mass Constitution, also stated directly below in the "Constitutional Role" area? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.190.10 (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link to William Gaston is to the wrong William Gaston. There is currently no page for Governor William Gaston. I am unsure how to add a page for someone with an identical name. If someone can do this, please fix the link.

Thank you.

• Done! See William Gaston (Massachusetts). —Markles 22:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the governors of Mass. Bay colony are going to be included here, then the governors of the Plymouth colony should also be listed here, as what is Massachusetts today was not just what the Massachusetts Bay Clony was then.

Out of curiosity, are Congressmen who represent Massachusetts not eligible because they apparently reside mostly in Washington, D.C.?

No, I don't think so. I believe a requirement for a Congressman is to be a resident of the state he or she is representing, so obviously that means a Massachusetts Congressman officially is a resident of Massachusetts.

In the new table, with Acting Governors denoted with an 'A' in place of a number, it seems a little redundant to place the words 'Acting Governor' under their name. The only exception I think would be someone like Celucci who was both Acting Gov and Gov in his own right at different times. --Briancua 14:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Granted this was the currency of the colonial era, but after the Declaration of Independence, when these positions were created - surely not?

To be eligible for either office, a candidate must have lived in Massachusetts for at least seven years immediately preceding his election, and originally also had to be a Christian owning at least £1,000 worth of real property.

OMG, it's true!

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Commonwealth_of_Massachusetts_%281780%29#Section_I:_The_Governor

Article II

The governor shall be chosen [annually]; and no person shall be eligible to this office, unless at the time of his election, he shall have been an inhabitant of this commonwealth for seven years next preceding; [and unless he shall at the same time, be seised in his own right, of a freehold within the commonwealth of the value of one thousand pounds; and unless he shall declare himself to be of the Christian religion.] [See Amendments, Articles. VII, XXXIV, LXIV and LXXX.]

The clincher: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_pound

Image:Mitt romney.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article for Massachusetts Governor's Mansion is very lean and mostly says that Massachusetts doesn't have a governor's mansion. It's an interesting detail but it really doesn't seem worth devoting an entire article to. Tim Pierce 18:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support —Markles 19:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The article is comparable in length to other states. Sahasrahla 21:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not the length of the article that concerns me, it's that the Massachusetts Governor's Mansion doesn't exist. That makes it distinctly non-encyclopedic in my mind. :-) The fact that Massachusetts has no governor's mansion is a fine detail to add to the Governor of Massachusetts article; it's not a subject for an article in its own right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twp (talk • contribs) 15:20, August 13, 2007
• Strong Support. Apparently Idaho, Montana and Rhode Island do not have official governor residences either, as shown by the red links in the Official Residences of United States Governors template {{US Governor Mansions}}. Merge this article's text into the Governor of Massachusetts article and redirect it. Truthanado 16:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Since there is no actual mansion and its not that long so it will not effect the other article much. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gang14 (talk • contribs) 16:32:52, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

In the top photo, the Governor is addressed as 'His Excelency', shouldn't it be 'The Honorable'? SteveMancarelli (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In many states yes; but in Massachusetts, Excellency is the proper title. See Governor of Massachusetts. Otherwise, good catch. Sahasrahla (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I (and someone else before me) have reverted changes made by an anonymous editor to the formatting and content of the listing of governors. These changes are objectionable for several reasons:

• Information was removed that was present in the existing table (specifically, the Electoral History column)
• It does not use named party coloring (by transclusion of a suitable template)
• An inexplicably-populated "Term" column was introduced, which at best exposes extreme ignorance over the history of the term length of the governorship
• It includes, for no obvious reason, the individual's age at the time of their death
• It omits the acting governors entirely, and introduces the misconception that lieutenant governors become governor instead of acting as such

All of the omissions have useful encyclopedic value. Magic♪piano 15:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Governor of Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928211108/http://www.shirleyeustishouse.org/residents.html to http://www.shirleyeustishouse.org/residents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Under other high offices held, I have added William Claflin 1869–1872 who was in Congress 1877-81. 07:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Noel Ellis

Anonymous editor(s) have been adding claims here (repeatedly reverted by myself and others) that the governor is subject to term limits. There are no constitutional limits on the number of terms a governor can serve, unless someone can cite a specific amendment saying as much (there certainly were none in the unamended constitution). Search away. Magic♪piano 17:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to do some. It asks nicely to bring them up here first. I am doing so. It will prune excess info, source every thing, fix the issues, and bring it in line with the other governor lists. --Golbez (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the list of governors section should be split into a separate article called List of governors of Massachusetts. Since other states like Georgia have separate pages for the list of governors then I believe that Massachusetts should be the same. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk) 12:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that the list was merged into this article in 2012, after having been split out in 2007. Magic♪piano 17:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which is a really, really long time ago. I support a split. --Golbez (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support colonial governors were very different from from the current ones colonials should be split plus they were apointed by the crown so having them in same page would be like having for example the govenors of Benin in the same page as the heads of state of Benin it makes little sense to me .

Friendlyhistorian (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. The article has grown since 2012, so splitting (or de-merging) the article makes sense. --Woko Sapien (talk) 20:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I agree with the logic here. Regardless of what may have been done with the page in the past, the information should be on it’s own list, as is done with most (if not all) other U.S. states. AbbiLy02 (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes i support it too for the reasons i mentioned Friendlyhistorian (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]