Talk:Fresco-secco

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

In my opinion the differences between the wall painting techniques fresco and fresco secco have to be reconsidered. For me a fresco is painted on a fresh, wet plaster, a secco on a dry plaster. Then there are some "mixed techniques" in which the painter started in fresco technique, but finished in secco technique. I think the information of the existing possibility of a mixed technique should be included in both articles and the article fresco secco should be called secco. What does everybody else think about that? --Greenadia06 (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I forgot to say that for me a fresco-secco is a painting on a dry plaster, but on a wet limewash. What do you think? --Greenadia06 (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fresco-secco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205230531/http://www.tamiluniversity.ac.in/download_pdfs/tamil%20civilization.pdf to http://www.tamiluniversity.ac.in/download_pdfs/tamil%20civilization.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]