Jump to content

Talk:Everytime We Touch (Cascada song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Kind of weird, someone messed with the chart page - and made everything go under the 2005 year, when only Germany's chart position was in he 2005 year. Whoever did that was on drugs...

Wth.. Why is Cascada mentioned FIRST in this article? All they did was a rape a good song and badly.. I reckon nobody feels bad if this article is modified to mention the Maggie Reilly's version first and mention the cover-ish Cascada song after it.. Yeah, I know, it's just my opinion but isn't it traditionally done so in Wikipedia that the former recordings are mentioned first?--88.115.245.243 17:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even as if Cascada was the first one to remake it, either. Tixiana and Lacara both had versions of the song (that kept all of the original lyrics) before Cascada's came out. 12.42.50.52 18:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, the Cascada version is the most popular. It's more likely people are searching for info about the Cascada version when they search for this song. 24.218.65.219 21:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wooooot? I reached this article from Maggie Reilly , and I was very amazed to see this. I listen to the radio, I go to discos and I have NEVER heard of "Cascada" or this cover version. I think this song is considered somewhat a classic - at least in my country - and to overwrite it with a promotion for some one-hit-wonder is quite shameless... Medico80 00:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it isn't like Cascada totally took the song, they just borrowed the chorus. It isn't like that has ever happened before, I mean the Gym Class Heroes in Cupid's Chokehold stole that chorus for their song too. Anyways if you really care about Maggie Reiley, she did give consent to use the chorus. She gets royalties too. Tylerhuyser 22:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC) T.H.[reply]

I think all this advertising garbage needs an edit. My first question, when I saw this article, was: "Who the .... is Cascada?" Even if Maggie Reilly gave her consent to a cover version... it still is a cover version. Cascada are neither the authors nor the original performers. This is not about who is getting royalties, but about giving righteous credit (and not stealing the fame of others). Wikipedia is a place for information, not for promotion. --62.47.4.138 16:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I edited the damn article and yeah I quite much butt-assaulted the Cascada part of the song. Sue me or revert it to the last version, I just had to do this because as said above, the article was more like a commercial for Cascada than an impartial review on the song in question. --Petrim 21:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just reverted the article to Petrim's version. If anyone wants to see what this article should look like, take a loot at Paint it black. That song was covered by almost any artist on earth. Still, the article gives credit to the original performers. BTW... I did a coverversion of "Paint it black" which was quite popular. Am I allowed to extinguish the Stones from that article now? And to claim the song as mine? I am really a bit surprised, to see a wikipedia-administrator revert an article back to advertising and plain false information, without even giving an explanation! --62.47.13.233 12:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that, because Cascada's "Everytime We Touch" is a different song (only the chorus is the same), it should have its own article. However I'm not going to create one, I'll leave it up to someone else if they want to. I suggest it be located at Everytime We Touch (Cascada song). I don't think the article should have been changed to a different song, it should have been moved and then the resulting redirect changed to this article. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 21:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and did it anyway, I split the page history into two new articles. The Cascada one probably needs cleanup now. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 21:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Having heard both songs I would object to Cascada's work beeing more then just a coverversion. Therefore I would rather have one page, naming the original artist and then giving (even very detailed) information about the coverversion. Nevertheless, having the two pages seems an acceptable compromise.--62.47.8.78 08:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although the song got its own article, I also felt it was little more than "advertising garbage". It's ridiculous, the article barely mentions that this is basically an irrelevant trivial cover of a well-known Maggie Reilly song. Quite obvious far off any encyclopaedic standards. --79.200.48.97 (talk) 23:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B000A6CLGK.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg

[edit]

Image:B000A6CLGK.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne of Cascada Cover

[edit]

There is Trance written as genre. I don't think that the genre is trance. Maybe it's Eurodance, but on de.wikipedia there is a more specific genre for it: Hands Up. I'm afraid the article for this genre doesn't exist on en.wikipedia.
--D-Kuru (talk) 00:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the genre from Trance to Eurodance. This is not a trance song at all. -Dreamer2go 01:01, 04 January 2008 (+8 GMT)

Fair use rationale for Image:Everytime We Touch.jpg

[edit]

Image:Everytime We Touch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Everytime We Touch.jpg

[edit]

Image:Everytime We Touch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Maggie Reilly's Everytime We Touch

[edit]

How come with other covers there's always a request to have it merged with the original, but not here? They should merge it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.149.53.238 (talk) 04:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.54.25.230 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Everytime We Touch (Cascada song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Everytime We Touch (Cascada song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Everytime We Touch (Cascada song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Everytime_We_Touch_(Cascada_song)&oldid=1198545277"