Talk:Dorman Long

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yorkshire Mid‑importance Dorman Long is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Image:Newwembleystadium.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article contradicts the one on the Tyne Bridge page. It states (The Sydney Harbour Bridge)"...was partly modelled on the Tyne Bridge". However the Tyne Bridge article states "The Tyne Bridge was designed by Mott, Hay and Anderson who based their design on the Hell Gate Bridge in New York... and the Sydney Harbour Bridge"

If the dates given in the article are correct then either the Tyne Bridge was modelled off the Sydney Harbour bridge (Sydney Harbour bridge was designed in 1916, no date is given for the design of the Tyne Bridge but plans were approved in 1924) or both were modelled off the Hell Gate Bridge which was completed in 1916 It cannot be that the Sydney Harbour bridge was modelled off the Tyne Bridge which started construction much later (albeit finished earlier) Harani66 (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is just as you say, Harani66 - but compare the designs: Hell Gate & Sydney Harbour bridges are essentially the same shape, Tyne Bridge is quite distinct. The two bigger bridges have their inner arch meeting the ground with the outer arch levelling off to end up pointing at the pylons (not structurally joined to the pylons in either case). The arches of the Tyne bridge meet at ground level. I am sure the two facts, that Dorman Long was contractor for Sydney Harbour & Tyne bridges and that the Tyne bridge was finished first have given this myth believability but you only have to look at the structures themselves.Moletrouser (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a question, there is a bridge around my area made around my area which was built by Dorman Long and was built in 1883. Were they building bridges (Not little footpath bridges or little bridges in general) before 1883 and if not, was this their first? Glaramara12 22:13, 26 september (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dorman Long. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303143208/http://www.clevelandbridge.com/history.html to http://www.clevelandbridge.com/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Dorman Long tower was listed, and linked to the relevant Historic England webpage. Then it was unlisted, the webpage disappeared (they don't seem to keep a list of previously listed items), and some but not all, of the Historic England references were redirected to the Wayback Machine's archive copy. There is at least one that slipped through: 1955 on the timeline. I have tried to redirect it, but it only made a mess so I have left well alone. Can anyone correct it tidily?--Verbarson (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an archive citation to the 1955 entry on the timeline: I am not sure if I have done what you had in mind. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was the one with the error, yes. I had assumed it would then look the same as ref 28 (it actually looks tidier) because they are all pointing at the same archive?--Verbarson (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now consolidated all four references which use the same English Heritage citation. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both Dorman Long and Cleveland Bridge seem to claim responsibility for the Tyne Bridge and Sydney Harbour Bridge long before they were brought togethor by Trafalgar House. Both basically did structural steel parts of the job so which was it really? Ed1964 (talk) 01:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]