Talk:Colin King-Ansell

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

If the "first tape of the interview was accidentally not broadcast", how was it that the 1968 interview provoked anger from some members of the public? Was there a second (duplicate) tape, or a second half of the interview, which was broadcast? If only half of the interview was broadcast- by "mistake" - could it be that he was then effectively being quoted out of context? As a lot is being made of this broadcast, a little more detail is required.203.184.41.226 (talk) 19:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone was wondering what this referred to, I think it might have been a slight mistelling of what happened. When researching the article, I read (sorry, I forget where, but it was a mainstream NZ news article, online) that the interviewer had been friendly to Ansell before the interview (to get him to agree to it), and then proceeded to shaft him in the interview. However, much to his chagrin, there was a problem and the interview was not recorded, so he had to go back straight away and ask if Ansell was willing to do the interview again. He was surprised to find Ansell thought it had gone well the first time, and was happy to do it again. Bromley86 (talk) 06:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colin King-Ansell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050620092754/http://aijac.org.au/review/1998/231/nznazis.html to http://www.aijac.org.au/review/1998/231/nznazis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]