Jump to content

Talk:Christkind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christkindl

[edit]

Christkindl isn't a small village, it's part of Steyr. Falsely it's often called a village, but actually this is just a marketing concept. It's part of a historical city. --Scml (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Kristkind into this article

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was apparently someone already merged it. Fine by me. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kristkind is just a variant spelling of Christkind, the proper term. Why there are separate articles is beyond me. -- Svenman (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I am from south of Germany and never saw the spelling Kristkind before. The proper spelling would be Christkind that's why I also recommend to merge it. The figure described is for sure the same. --84.153.18.141 (talk) 08:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8405501.stm seems relevant to this article. Sorry I'm not really sure how to edit, or what the guidelines are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.15.21 (talk) 05:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Svenman Everyone is too lazy to merge it. I'd say the merger would be a good thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.134.157.168 (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Date of arrival

[edit]

It'd be nice, thanks - it's what I came looking for and it's not presently on the page. Not knowing it, I can't add it. --62.58.152.52 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT merge Ježíšek and Christkind articles

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to not merge. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposition to merge the Ježíšek and Christkind articles. I oppose this proposition. It is sufficient to have links between both articles. Although the traditions are similar, they are two distinctly different figures, with Christkind being an angel-like figure, and Ježíšek having no representation. People looking for Christkind should be directed to the Christkind article, people looking for Ježíšek should be directed to the Ježíšek article, so please leave it as it is now and remove the merger proposition from the article.KathaLu (talk) 06:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

differences of where gifts are put

[edit]

in many parts of south America, the gifts are given under the bed, or on its sides, while the kid is asleep, and I know as it was part of my youth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verdad1963 (talkcontribs) 04:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative to Saint Nicholas

[edit]

This article mentions that Christkind was promulgated by Protestants who also changed the date of gift giving to Christmas Eve, but it doesn't explain why. The reason is that Protestants opposed veneration of saints, so they adopted Christkind as an alternative to Saint Nicholas, and morphed the tradition of giving gifts on Saint Nicholas Day to giving gifts on Christmas Eve. Nosferattus (talk) 17:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]