Talk:Charnock Richard

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is the Latvian Embassy really in Charnock Richard????

I believe it to be at:

45 Nottingham Place

London W1U 5LY

United Kingdom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.201.167 (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that "The village was named in the early 13th century by the local landowner, who gave the township his first name of Richard, to distinguish it from neighbouring Heath Charnock" needs verification, of course, but it's also a point of interest; if someone could add a few details (e.g. who the landowner was) to the article, that'd be great. Ministry (talk) 14:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charnock Richard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328175531/http://www.lancashireparishcouncils.gov.uk:80/parishes/parish_display.asp?parishid=159 to http://www.lancashireparishcouncils.gov.uk/parishes/parish_display.asp?parishid=159
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235048/http://www.english-nature.org.uk/special/sssi/unit_details.cfm?situnt_id=1011476 to http://www.english-nature.org.uk/special/sssi/unit_details.cfm?situnt_id=1011476
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080118054710/http://www.msatrivia.co.uk:80/m6charnockr.asp to http://www.msatrivia.co.uk/m6CharnockR.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Charnock Richard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927064828/http://www.chorley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1186 to http://www.chorley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1186
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lancashireparishcouncils.gov.uk/parishes/parish_display.asp?parishid=159
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.msatrivia.co.uk/m6CharnockR.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927064828/http://www.chorley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1186 to http://www.chorley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1186

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]