Talk:A Case of Conscience

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Official church guidelines for dealing with extraterrestrials." has certainly got to be incorrect. 137.30.251.117 (talk) 06:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Why do you think so? Fredrik Coulter (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for one, that cite actually links back to the top of the page. For another, speaking as a Catholic who has actually done some research into the issue, there really isn't any 'Official Church Guideline' for this. 74.75.5.28 (talk) 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC

Blish actually summarizes the views of the author Gerald Heard, who studied theology in his degree at Cambridge, representing these as an indication of the views that he (Blish) received in several letters from Catholic theologians. Heard's views are not presented as official guidelines, but Blish does take them to match the Church's position on the "plurality of worlds". Metamagician3000 (talk) 00:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the offending paragraph, as it can't be salvaged in anything like its existing form. Perhaps a more accurate paragraph could be written based on the material here on the talk page, though it's an obscure point and I don't think it would belong in the lede. Metamagician3000 (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]