Talk:47 Rojulu

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Andhra Pradesh / Tamil Nadu / Cinema This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles This redirect is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu. This redirect is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

@Kailash, director K Balachander actually made this film originally in Tamil, we all know that Chiranjeevi was very popular among Telugu youth in late 70’s and early 80’s. That’s why Balachander decided to dub 47 Natkal into 47 Rojulu for Telugu audience, after wtaching the films both language-versions I have understood very clearly that the Tamil-language version is original. On the other hand both 47 Natkal and 47 Rojulu share everything except th language. Now you decide should 47 Natkal and 47 Rojulu have separate mentioning like the Aalavandhan and Abhay? Though Abhay had a slightly different cast from Aalavandhan, but in this Natkal and Rojulu case just the language differs. Shipir Bipir (talk) 10:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer all info from this to 47 Natkal. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash, What you will you do it’s photo? Shipir Bipir (talk) 01:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. Just wait for its deletion. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]