Talk:1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 1, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / North Indian Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the North Indian Ocean work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Nepal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 22:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink! I will be reviewing this article. Once again, I think this is a good choice for nomination for Good Article, which is probably why the article is currently rated as B-class :P Anyway, there are a few things that I feel should be address before I can pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 22:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• How active would the season have been considered? Above? Below? Average/near average?

• Below, actually. Added. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Any explanation for the lack of tropical cyclogenesis between mid-May and mid-September?

• Storms rarely form in the basin from June to August, due to the position of the monsoon being located over India. Storms typically only form when the monsoon is far south enough, over waters, and in which the low has enough time to develop over open waters. This is something common climatologically, just like lack of storms forming in the Atlantic before June. I'm not sure it's appropriate for this specific article, but I can add if you want. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I think that's a good explanation, but unless there's proof that that was the case this season (which it doesn't sound like), don't add it. I'll let this slide.--12george1 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "Collectively, the three systems killed 146 people, mostly related to the third system which produced a deadly storm surge in Bangladesh." - I'm thinking you meant to say the second system, which caused 86 deaths, while the third system left 60 deaths. Also, it looks like the deaths from the second system were caused by flooding in India, rather than storm surge in Bangladesh. Or am I missing something?

• Yea, the third storm killed 60 people in Bangladesh, as well as 47 deaths in India (of the 86 overall Indian deaths from the depressions). I didn't mention the 47 deaths due to the third storm, as I didn't feel a breakdown was needed, and who is to say that flooding from the first storm didn't contribute at all to the death from the third storm? It was an unusual format, writing about the three deep depressions in one section, but I felt like the similar natures and impact warranted such a format. I can explain more if you need. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Nah, don't change it. I was confused a little bit at first, plus there was probably a reading comprehension fail on my part :P But hey, it's better than being poorly educated ;) --12george1 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "additional day until dissipation east of the Somalia coastline."? No love (link) for Somalia? :P

• Eh, thought it was common enough :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "developing an eye in the middle of the convection" - Wikilink to eye (cyclone)

• Thanks, good catch. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see any grammar or spelling errors

Yeah, so work on those issues and I will pass this and list it as a Good Article.--12george1 (talk) 22:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hope that all makes sense. I believe I addressed the issues. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm going to pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]