User talk:Warner REBORN

This user may have left Wikipedia. Warner REBORN has not edited Wikipedia since 25 February 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hi Warner REBORN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a move proposal if you want to move British English. This has been discussed previously and is contentious. See Wikipedia:Moving a page for further guidance. Regards, Rob (talk | contribs) 13:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thanks for Advice --Warner REBORN (talk) 16:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LOTR motion picture Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately it appears the BFI database should not be used for the Country field. It includes every country, even those of minor companies only listed in a film's end credits crawl. And it lists them alphabetically, so as we saw with World War Z (film) a minor country can be listed before the principal country. If a company is not in the film's main titles or the poster's billing block, we should not list it or its country on WP.

This is also true with The Wolverine (film). The three production companies given in the film's main title credits - 20th Century Fox, Marvel Entertainment and The Donners' Company - are all American.

If you look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, you'll see consensus is to not list the countries of minor companies not named in the billing block. The BFI includes every minor company, so it is not a good source for the Country parameter. The AFI is much more reliable, the single best database, but none is perfect. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not 100% disagree with your views however, in my time on Wikipedia and well before it BFI has always been used as the most reliable source. The BFI has fact and establishes neutrality (including foreign countries and not just BRITAIN) - AFI has been shown to be the opposite, ignoring most apart from AMERICA. It is fact that co-production countries should be listed. I am sorry if for some reason this angers you. Other users that I have come to respect such as User:SchroCat have strongly alerted me to BFI's accuracy, that's why we use it so often and frequently. Please do not edit war. I'm sorry but in this case the facts speak for there self. Thank You --Warner REBORN (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reply. The AFI is correct more often than the BFI, and you have not demonstrated otherwise. But let's look at this case in particular. I explained to you that the three production companies listed above for The Wolverine (film) - 20th Century Fox, Marvel Entertainment and The Donners' Company - are American. You have not responded to that or explained which one you think is British. You further have not explained why the UK should be listed first, even after I told you the BFI always lists countries in alphabetical order. Instead you apparently intend to blindly follow whatever the BFI says, are are now WP:edit warring to enforce your point of view. You have been reverted. You should be aware of WP:BRD and WP:3RR, and stop putting that in the article. - Gothicfilm (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The AFI is correct more often than the BFI"—unsubstantiated and opinionated nonsense. You got anything to back that up? The AFI Catalog has more holes than Swiss cheese, and reliance on that without other sources does you and the project a disservice. - SchroCat (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The AFI is very reliable in listing credits by how they actually appear on screen, while the BFI bundles together the director, the second unit director and the assistant directors with no distinction between them in the Direction section. The same with other categories. It mixes together cinematographers with camera operators and camera assistants. Take a look at their listing for The Wolverine: http://explore.bfi.org.uk/51c0dcee596d2. - Gothicfilm (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That makes the AFI more detailed NOT more reliable: there is a massive difference that I don't think you appreciate. - SchroCat (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So listing the credits by how they actually appear on screen is not reliable. Good argument. - Gothicfilm (talk) 23:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with both sides in parts. Gothicfilm, you're still making your unsubstantiated claim of the AFI being more accurate, when this isn't shown to be the case. On the other hand, only listing the countries of those mentioned in the billing block actually makes sense to me too. I think the article needs to be reverted to just United States for the moment, since that's the long standing consensus and it's not got a solid argument for inclusion. According to Template:Infobox film, we should only report universally reported countries, and the BFI seems to be the only one mentioning the UK, and one reliable source doesn't override two. Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 23:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added UK Production company Ingenious Media which is listed as "made in association with" in film credits. Therefore making it a US / UK co-production. The basic fact is Wikipedia is designed to present facts not opinions. I have added facts and they should be left instead of a clearly up factual opinion. US is listed above UK as I presume it was slightly more American than British. Though from past experience, it should not be listed as "American-British" or "American". It should be left, what User:Gothicfilm is trying to do is childish, And I will be the first to admit, I used to behave in similar ways but learnt from editors such as SOCK and SCHROCAT. I would recommend Gothicfilm does the same. I would in this case disagree with User:Sock and don't get what consensus he is leading to. It should be left. Thank You Warner REBORN (talk) 10:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even going for a consensus right now, I'm saying everyone needs to stop reverting and changing it until we're done discussing. The article should remain how it was, with only the US listed, until we reach a consensus. That's how these discussions are able to work, so no edit wars start up and people don't get angry. It's in poor faith to change a subject of controversy to a suggestion, not what has been long-standing and agreed upon. I'm personally unconvinced that Ingenious Media's involvement makes it noteworthy to say it was a British-American co-production, because like Gothicfilm said, the main production companies are all American. But the primary point I'm making, the most important one, is that the article go to how it was before this dispute until it is resolved, not keep getting changed until everybody's angry. If the consensus is to add the UK, we will. No rush. Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 11:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't change credits on films without discussion or edit summary, like you did with Superman (1978 film), as seen with this dif here. The cast order is well established by the onscreen credits and the poster, and that's what we go by. - Gothicfilm (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The official website is interstellarmovie.com, not interstellar-movie.com. The owner of the fan site is very clever in making it look official, but there is a disclaimer saying that it is not official. The "Synopsis" section references the official synopsis, which is much simpler. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik (talk | contrib)cheers for the head up. I didn't see that when I researched that. Thanks again. PS. Glad your back from your holiday. --Warner REBORN (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm still on my holiday. :) Today is a rest day for my family. Hence my series of edits today! I will be back in a week. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then hope you enjoy the rest of your time :) --Warner REBORN (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pavel Parkhomenko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e decker^talk 21:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I will delete it now. I'm sorry. I planned to expand with references but haven't, because moved on to other areas. Thanks again. --Warner REBORN (talk) 16:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't, i'm not an administrator. But please do delete it. --Warner REBORN (talk) 16:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reverted by at least three different editors for linking London in multiple film infoboxes, yet you went and did it at least two more times today. Check out WP:OVERLINK (point 2). London is a common name. - Gothicfilm (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok --Warner REBORN (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you now linking countries in film infoboxes? You've been here long enough to know that is going against the formatting style we use. - Gothicfilm (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still at it, changing credits to suit your own view, as seen at Fast & Furious 7 with this dif. You ignored the hidden note to promote your favored actor. You actually wrote in your edit summary Changed cast based on what is likely order. Jason Statham is a very high profile actor. And as antagonist won't be out ordered by the likes of Lucas Black. - which shows how hollow your claims to always follow reliable sources are. And you jumped JS ahead of not only Black but other franchise regulars. - Gothicfilm (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gothicfilm, This message resembles no importance to me. I am only editing on the basis of what will likely happen. Do not keep posting pointless messages to me. JS is a very expensive actor that I can guarantee Universal Pictures will be keen to have him high up the billing board. Since we have no evidence at the moment - I think neither us our suited to comment. I will not change it for the time being. --Warner REBORN (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PaddingtonPOSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DWdeepbreathBR.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gagarin: First in Space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gagarin: First in Space until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cowlibob (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I've withdrawn this nom. Another editor did some great work in proving its notability. Here are sources that you could use to improve the article that were identified by the editor. Some are non-English but can be transliterated.

IE: [1], [2], ^[dead link], [3], [4], [5], [6] [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15],[16]

entry at the Russian Wikipedia (For additional references.)

Critic reviews Hope you find these helpful! Happy editing. Cowlibob (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cowlibob, I have Warners page on my watchlist, you could have phrased that "Here are sources that we could use to improve the article", as per WP:BEFORE. Warner is relatively new, he admits being a bit rash in his earlier edits, but has put in some good edits and is very co-operative of late. Creating an article without expanding it is not in itself a fault, I am sure he will learn as he goes along, like all of us. Murry1975 (talk) 08:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise if I appeared discourteous that was not my intention. I'll try to improve my phrasing in the future. Cowlibob (talk) 08:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will keep expanding it. As I go along I want to try and steer away from the article like most editors so it can be edited by a wider range of editors. Thanks again. --Warner REBORN (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:PaddingtonHEADvfx.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa Please help. Where do I add the summary. --Warner REBORN (talk) 19:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PaddingtonHEADvfx.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:InterstellerWORMHOLE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Stefan2, it is being used on Interstellar (film), however I believed another editor changed or re-uploaded the image. --Warner REBORN (talk) 11:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That image is not in use in that article. The article uses a different image. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2, corrected, it is now being used, so please do not delete it. --Warner REBORN (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warner, I removed the image. It is too high quality, and the image that was already used was perfectly appropriate and correctly sized. Your image, at its size, violates fair use. No reason to change it. Sock (tock talk) 18:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(tock talk), I added my image before the other one and was re-uploaded for no reason. --Warner REBORN (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United kingdom relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United kingdom relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EoRdE6 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on United kingdom relations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EoRdE6 (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You want to delete it then sure go ahead. --Warner REBORN (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on, did you say promoting a COMPANY - You need to look again and possibly go to Specsavers. --Warner REBORN (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Interstelar-Nolan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BatmanWING - Dark Knight Trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CivilWarConceptMARVEL.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:File 124568 0 captainamericacivilwar (2).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of Arrow episodes. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend Thanks for the notice. --Warner REBORN (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIB-AOD-poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:File 164501 0 women in black intl.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:File 164501 0 women in black intl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIB-AOD-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TopGearLogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article DC Telvision Shared Universe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A better more in depth and structured article is already being developed at Draft:The CW's shared DC Comics TV universe and has yet to be moved over because the Universe itself has yet to have the necessary coverage beyond the individual shows. This causes it to fail WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SHERLOCK LOGO BBC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KILL BILL bloody affair.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheFLASHlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the James Bond (film series) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the content here [17] is from [18]

Our copyright detector picks this up. Please say in the edit summary when you move stuff around. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lawrence of Arabia (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 21:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hotel Rwanda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 23:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lawrence of Arabia (film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lawrence of Arabia (film). You are violating policy and the talk page consensus. Please stop. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I feel like I'm in a kind of weird spot here, Warner Reborn. You're edit warring on Lawrence of Arabia (film) and have a level four warning. Then you add poorly-sourced content to Alien: Covenant, for which I was going to warn you. But you've already got a level four warning. So what am I supposed to do? Go to ANI and ask an uninvolved administrator to block you? That seems kind of heavy-handed for what I was going to do – a simple request to not add poorly-sourced content. The citation you added is just an "about us" page from a corporation, not a reliable source that discusses the nationality of the film in question. How about this: you just stop being disruptive and edit warring, or at least keep your disruption off my watchlist so that I don't feel compelled to do something about it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is what he does. Repeats the same disputed edits over years, usually regarding the UK. See posts on his history with earlier name WARNER one (9999) at Talk:Avatar (2009 film)/Archive 25#Country from June 2014. Note that on another's editor's Talk page in 2014 he says he's done and is not going to continue with this anymore. Then two days ago he does the exact same thing again. He has shown this pattern on dozens and dozens of film pages, usually with no discussion. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:44, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lawrence of Arabia (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Softlavender (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:REALTopGearLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lynda Obst PD.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HammerLOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Thanks for uploading File:SyncopyInc. logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Expendables-STALLONE-SkullLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]