User contributions for My first is in ptarmigan
Results for My first is in ptarmigan talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 20 edits. Account created on 27 October 2008.
26 May 2010
- 01:3101:31, 26 May 2010 diff hist +407 Wikipedia:User experience feedback →collapsable things wont uncollapse: new section
- 01:2101:21, 26 May 2010 diff hist +512 N User:My first is in ptarmigan after much experimentation and previews I think this is as good as it will get current
- 00:2100:21, 26 May 2010 diff hist +51 Brass rubbing I have toned down some of the language and marked as being very UK based and as not having any footnotes. I think I've done so correctly but please check
10 November 2008
- 23:3423:34, 10 November 2008 diff hist +974 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting →Wrong: two replies: standardising dates does not need delinking. Articles that have been delinked are still a mess.
8 November 2008
- 20:3220:32, 8 November 2008 diff hist +692 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting →Wrong: please do not ignore the arguments of those who you disagree with. please show evidence of this consensus you claim.
4 November 2008
- 21:3021:30, 4 November 2008 diff hist +812 Talk:Maria Sharapova →Edit warring on this article: linked dates give context and thus added value. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date autoformatting#Wrong
- 21:2421:24, 4 November 2008 diff hist +1,504 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting →Wrong: ad hominem arguments are irrelevant, please explain WHY you don't like this proposal when it would achieve the goal of sane wikicode with the benefits of wikilinks
- 11:1711:17, 4 November 2008 diff hist +298 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting →Wrong: Still no response. I'm starting to think the proponents of date delinking are afraid of discussing the issue lest they be proven wrong
- 11:1511:15, 4 November 2008 diff hist +615 Maria Sharapova Restore consensus version
3 November 2008
- 00:2000:20, 3 November 2008 diff hist +615 Maria Sharapova reverting to last version that has consensus. GUIDELINES with questionable consensus do not trump active conensus of article editors.
29 October 2008
- 23:5823:58, 29 October 2008 diff hist +496 Talk:Tetrapod →Tone: new section
- 23:5423:54, 29 October 2008 diff hist +9 Tetrapod →Evolution: this section is very conversational in tone and doesn't read like most of wikipedia does
- 23:3423:34, 29 October 2008 diff hist −27 Tetrapod →Devonian tetrapods: copyediting of one paragraph.
- 20:4620:46, 29 October 2008 diff hist +1,005 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Date autoformatting →Wrong: Another suggestion
- 20:4020:40, 29 October 2008 diff hist +1,482 User talk:HJensen →date links: new section
- 12:3012:30, 29 October 2008 diff hist +17 Rory McGrath Small improvements, one additional citation requested
- 12:2612:26, 29 October 2008 diff hist +1,788 Maria Sharapova Please refrain from delinking the dates, there is clearly no consensus to do so.
- 12:2512:25, 29 October 2008 diff hist +8 Ole Clausen Mørch While the "guidline" at MOSNUM is clear it is not clear there is consensus for it, specifically there is no consensus that birth and death dates in the lead of biographical articles should be delinked
27 October 2008
- 20:0820:08, 27 October 2008 diff hist +7 Neville Longbottom (character) →Family: My understanding is that Harry Potter character articles are treated as British articles wrt date formatting. I've consequently adjusted the birth date in this section to that format.
- 20:0620:06, 27 October 2008 diff hist +16 Romy Schneider birth and death dates in biographical articles are high value links, so I have added them
