User contributions for 90.196.204.46

5 October 2015

• 20:2220:22, 5 October 2015 diff hist +96‎ User talk:Primefac →In for a penny, in for a pound: new section
• 20:1920:19, 5 October 2015 diff hist −295‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) No edit summary
• 19:3719:37, 5 October 2015 diff hist +253‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.196.204.46 reported by User:Primefac (Result: )
• 19:3019:30, 5 October 2015 diff hist +354‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.196.204.46 reported by User:Primefac (Result: )
• 19:2519:25, 5 October 2015 diff hist +303‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.196.204.46 reported by User:Primefac (Result: )
• 19:1819:18, 5 October 2015 diff hist +173‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.196.204.46 reported by User:Primefac (Result: )
• 19:1819:18, 5 October 2015 diff hist +173‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) I shall be the grown up.
• 19:1419:14, 5 October 2015 diff hist +414‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:90.196.204.46 reported by User:Primefac (Result: )
• 19:0919:09, 5 October 2015 diff hist +182‎ User talk:OceanHok →Bit annoying - but another "query" about deleted information
• 18:5918:59, 5 October 2015 diff hist +4‎ Pulfrich effect Undid revision 684288918 by Primefac (talk) so you admit the redirect wasn't enough?
• 18:5618:56, 5 October 2015 diff hist −143‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) Undid revision 684289636 by Primefac (talk) Seriously, lets not play rabbit season, duck season.
• 18:5418:54, 5 October 2015 diff hist −143‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) Undid revision 684289098 by Primefac (talk) Further to IRC convo, I cannot forge your signature to add your comment, Please just re-reg your vote.
• 18:5118:51, 5 October 2015 diff hist −143‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) Undid revision 684288581 by Primefac (talk) No edit wars please. Leave in my note about why not to delete.
• 18:4018:40, 5 October 2015 diff hist −143‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo) No edit summary
• 18:3818:38, 5 October 2015 diff hist −108‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nalu (demo) Undid revision 684283783 by K6ka (talk) I like how you didn't put mine back
• 18:3018:30, 5 October 2015 diff hist +250‎ Hal Kemp No edit summary
• 18:1118:11, 5 October 2015 diff hist −108‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nalu (demo) No edit summary
• 17:5817:58, 5 October 2015 diff hist +149‎ User talk:Czar →Deletions of Nvidia tech-demos
• 17:5317:53, 5 October 2015 diff hist +455‎ User talk:90.196.204.46 →Help me!: new section
• 17:5017:50, 5 October 2015 diff hist +1,048‎ User talk:Huon →Czar's edits: new section
• 17:4617:46, 5 October 2015 diff hist +509‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orb-3D No edit summary
• 17:4117:41, 5 October 2015 diff hist +248‎ User talk:90.196.204.46 No edit summary
• 17:3317:33, 5 October 2015 diff hist +371‎ User talk:K6ka →Using the vandal template
• 17:1217:12, 5 October 2015 diff hist +216‎ User talk:68.66.76.254 →Help me!
• 17:0817:08, 5 October 2015 diff hist +1,252‎ User talk:90.196.204.46 →Help me!: new section
• 17:0017:00, 5 October 2015 diff hist +842‎ User talk:K6ka →Using the vandal template: new section
• 16:5616:56, 5 October 2015 diff hist −13‎ User:Czar Undid revision 684268342 by SBaker43 (talk) Take in good faith, I'm trying to get the attention of someone who knows how to deal with this.
• 16:5516:55, 5 October 2015 diff hist +872‎ User talk:SBaker43 →Changes to my talk page: new section
• 16:3616:36, 5 October 2015 diff hist +588‎ User talk:OceanHok →Bit annoying - but another "query" about deleted information: new section
• 16:3216:32, 5 October 2015 diff hist +404‎ User talk:OceanHok →Splinter cell edits: new section
• 16:2516:25, 5 October 2015 diff hist +157‎ User talk:Wikisbadm10 No edit summary
• 16:2216:22, 5 October 2015 diff hist +364‎ User talk:OceanHok →Wrong use of vandal template (by me, maybe?): new section
• 16:1916:19, 5 October 2015 diff hist −13‎ User:Czar Undid revision 684264744 by AdrianGamer (talk) Not vandal, legit reasons.
• 16:1816:18, 5 October 2015 diff hist +17‎ User:Czar A lot of damaging edits to articles which I shall agree are not stellar. 2 very important Nvidia tech demos were removed. As well as a game which I first found via a page that links to it as notable for a certain effect. Poor redirects left.
• 16:0816:08, 5 October 2015 diff hist +379‎ User talk:Czar →Deletions of Nvidia tech-demos: new section
• 16:0216:02, 5 October 2015 diff hist −30‎ User:Czar Have I found the redirect king!?