User contributions for 208.152.231.254

30 December 2009

• 14:5614:56, 30 December 2009 diff hist −37 MPEG-1 →Color space: Being halved isn't being punished by being reduced by a small mount violently and barbarically as some kind of punishment! Reduced is a better term and doesn't need to be wikified.

9 November 2009

• 17:5417:54, 9 November 2009 diff hist −190 ABC News Live What does this even mean?

6 November 2009

• 21:4321:43, 6 November 2009 diff hist −30 House (TV series) →Filming style and locations: I assume this happened. If it didn't, please don't revert, remove.

2 November 2009

• 16:3016:30, 2 November 2009 diff hist −64 Wii system software →System Menu: Kinda like saying "Explorer.exe, contrary to popular belief, isn't an operating system". Who's saying it is?

28 October 2009

• 18:2418:24, 28 October 2009 diff hist +265 Talk:8VSB →Bifurcation of digital transmission systems
• 18:2218:22, 28 October 2009 diff hist −561 8VSB →Bifurcation of digital transmission systems: Removed section, not really applicable to the 8VSB article. I'm not a deletionist, but this really seemed inappropriate. Tag: section blanking
• 12:3912:39, 28 October 2009 diff hist +1 8VSB →Disputes over ATSC's use: +para
• 12:3812:38, 28 October 2009 diff hist −131 8VSB →Disputes over ATSC's use: The world has moved on...

27 October 2009

• 15:3115:31, 27 October 2009 diff hist −38 Gene therapy →Major developments in gene therapy: Even considering the question of whether the tag is useful to begin with, the content is quite clearly not in a list format, and is, actually, prose.

20 October 2009

• 18:4018:40, 20 October 2009 diff hist 0 Bolex Flat base and non curved head (ie 400ft magazine interface), with Reflex viewfinder, point to REX 5 model, not basic Reflex.
• 12:4712:47, 20 October 2009 diff hist −13 Multiple sub-Nyquist sampling encoding →Real world performance issues: "two frames" doesn't make any sense here. If I'm reading this correctly, there are four fields per frame, as the latter part of the sentence implies.

19 October 2009

• 18:3018:30, 19 October 2009 diff hist +205 List of common display resolutions Rv "axe to grind" edit. Added references. Term is demonstrably in use in industry media.
• 16:2116:21, 19 October 2009 diff hist −35 Multiple sub-Nyquist sampling encoding →History: I have a very good reason for removing this
• 14:2514:25, 19 October 2009 diff hist +2,453 2160p Undid revision 320452723 by GraYoshi2x (talk) Results of RfD should be respected

16 October 2009

• 18:2418:24, 16 October 2009 diff hist +785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2160p →2160p: Response. Yes, 2160p is a proposed/under development ''technology'', and Super Hi-Vision prototype cameras were actually made using 2160p sensors!
• 18:1718:17, 16 October 2009 diff hist +6 Monaural sound →History: I'm pretty sure this isn't true. I can't find specific cites for the original 35mm versions, but all modern versions of The Shining and FMJ have "stereo" (surround) audio, for example.
• 13:3713:37, 16 October 2009 diff hist +610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2160p →2160p: Keep.

14 October 2009

• 14:1714:17, 14 October 2009 diff hist +12 Template:High-definition OTOH, CBHD ought to be listed, as it's an existant operational format.
• 14:1514:15, 14 October 2009 diff hist −14 Template:High-definition Kinda silly to put it there specifically, especially with no tag against HD VMD and D-VHS. Indeed, it might be better to put (Continued) after Blu-ray....

13 October 2009

• 12:5812:58, 13 October 2009 diff hist +907 Talk:High-definition television →Requested move: Oppose move. HDTV generally refers to a device for receiving and viewing high definition television signals.

12 October 2009

• 18:3518:35, 12 October 2009 diff hist 0 High-definition television →Demise of analog HD sisters: ...and again
• 18:3418:34, 12 October 2009 diff hist −49 High-definition television Remove someone's test edit
• 18:3318:33, 12 October 2009 diff hist −163 High-definition television →High-definition display resolutions: 1080i thing is a big WTF. 1080i = 1080p in # of pixels/aspect ratios.

8 October 2009

• 16:1416:14, 8 October 2009 diff hist −26 Exatron Stringy Floppy Remove drive-by vandatag. If you re-insert it, actually express some specifics on the Talk: page.
• 12:5312:53, 8 October 2009 diff hist +746 Talk:MP3 →RE39,080: You appear to be right

7 October 2009

• 14:2314:23, 7 October 2009 diff hist +1,052 Talk:MP3 →RE39,080: new section
• 14:1114:11, 7 October 2009 diff hist −238 MP3 Undid revision 318180107: RE39,080 is a refiling, original filing was in 1988. The refile, not the original patent, was in 1994. Hence yes it's valid. Tag: references removed

2 October 2009

• 14:4414:44, 2 October 2009 diff hist +816 Talk:TIFF →How ironic...: Please don't!

28 September 2009

• 16:1416:14, 28 September 2009 diff hist +374 N Talk:Thread pitch ←Created page with 'Any reason why this article redirects to an article that describes a device to ''measure'' thread pitch but doesn't actually say what it is? Wouldn't it make more s...'

25 September 2009

• 12:2312:23, 25 September 2009 diff hist −4 Lens mount →List of lens mount types: I'm pretty sure California District 1 is not a lens mount...

16 September 2009

• 14:5014:50, 16 September 2009 diff hist −275 Vorbis →Licensing: Uncited despite requests, and plenty of people not connected with "rivals" are raising the issues according to earlier link so would be WP:UNDUE

15 September 2009

• 14:4514:45, 15 September 2009 diff hist +530 Talk:Bolex →Is this Antiques Roadshow?: new section

14 September 2009

• 15:4615:46, 14 September 2009 diff hist −91 Fractal compression Of course there's a relationship to the original resolution (the image is only accurate when recreated at that resolution. At higher resolutions, the algorithm will "make stuff up")
• 14:0014:00, 14 September 2009 diff hist +502 Talk:Comparison of audio coding formats →Avoiding a revert war: Thanks

4 September 2009

• 17:5217:52, 4 September 2009 diff hist +1,454 Talk:Comparison of audio coding formats →Avoiding a revert war: I'm asking those saying it is patented to prove a positive. You're asking me to prove a negative.
• 14:2314:23, 4 September 2009 diff hist +1,026 Talk:Comparison of audio coding formats →Avoiding a revert war: new section
• 14:1814:18, 4 September 2009 diff hist +17 Comparison of audio coding formats I'm not going to start a revert war, but I explained my reasons quite clearly and right now you haven't shown any evidence it is. I will revert tomorrow if you can't come up with a patent citation

3 September 2009

• 15:1415:14, 3 September 2009 diff hist −4 Comparison of audio coding formats If there are active patents to this 1991 technology that anyone is trying to enforce, it should be possible to cite them. All documentation I've read says this is not the case.
• 13:2713:27, 3 September 2009 diff hist +14 HD Radio →Overview: Paragraph implied the upgrade is a one off cost. That's not true. Royalties are payable on HD-2/3/4/etc. BTW CAPTCHA was "hearddelay", how hilarious is that?

2 September 2009

• 14:2714:27, 2 September 2009 diff hist +5,389 Talk:Fractal compression →Comments: new section

26 August 2009

• 13:3313:33, 26 August 2009 diff hist −6 MP3 →Licensing and patent issues {{Anchor | patent}}: Removed stray /ref closing tag Tag: references removed
• 13:3113:31, 26 August 2009 diff hist −49 Comparison of audio coding formats What patents apply to layer II? All citations I've seen suggest it's not patented. Also 2012 comment for MP3 is balderdash, patents filed in 1988 exist that will not expire until well after.

25 August 2009

• 15:2415:24, 25 August 2009 diff hist −221 MP3 →Licensing and patent issues {{Anchor | patent}}: Untrue. See RE39,080 for example, filed in 1988, expires in 2014. Approval dates can be delayed for all kinds of reasons. Tag: references removed

24 August 2009

• 17:5017:50, 24 August 2009 diff hist −16 DLNA →Contents: All of these went to disambig pages that do not link to anything relevant.

12 August 2009

• 15:4015:40, 12 August 2009 diff hist +299 Dolby Digital →Dolby Digital Plus: E-AC-3 isn't backward compatible with AC-3 at all. It must be transcoded. Dolby recommends ways to transcode to AC-3, but transcoding is nonetheless necessary.

13 July 2009

• 16:1216:12, 13 July 2009 diff hist −25 MPEG transport stream Blu-ray uses TSes.

9 July 2009

• 15:1815:18, 9 July 2009 diff hist +44 MPEG Surround →Legacy compatibility: Didn't NPOV-it enough
• 15:1715:17, 9 July 2009 diff hist −201 MPEG Surround →Legacy compatibility: Fix both to remove nonsensical NPOV hype and make the sentence actually informative and relevant. Who wrote this crap? Fraunhoffer's PR department?
• 15:1215:12, 9 July 2009 diff hist −1,588 MPEG Surround →Applications: NPOV fixes, as well as removal of significant amounts of redundant information.
• 15:0615:06, 9 July 2009 diff hist −624 MPEG Surround →Conclusions: Combination of gibberish, NPOV promotion, and outright false statements. Tag: section blanking