User contributions for 109.77.204.189
Appearance
Results for 109.77.204.189 talk block log logs global block log filter log
27 February 2022
- 20:1520:15, 27 February 2022 diff hist +10 Wikipedia talk:Review aggregators →According to...
- 20:1420:14, 27 February 2022 diff hist +679 Wikipedia talk:Review aggregators →According to...: Of all the variations why this one?
- 20:0720:07, 27 February 2022 diff hist −35 Lara Croft: Tomb Raider Editor claims he is "no longer here" and then claims he is being hounded, despite his making arbitrary changes to long established wording for no apparent reason. Undid revision 1073825249 by Nyxaros (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:0420:04, 27 February 2022 diff hist +51 The Cuphead Show! WP:NAMEDREFS
- 20:0220:02, 27 February 2022 diff hist +141 The Cuphead Show! Review from The Escapist, try to avoid selective quoting, don't leave out the important conclusion.
- 20:0020:00, 27 February 2022 diff hist +39 The Cuphead Show! Update Rotten Tomatoes. Weirdly the review count has gone down from 15 to 14.
- 19:5419:54, 27 February 2022 diff hist −18 The Cuphead Show! Single item does not need a list template.
- 19:5419:54, 27 February 2022 diff hist −17 The Cuphead Show! Revert. Editor who claims he isn't here also claims he is being hounded if he makes unexplained edits and others do not agree with him.
- 19:5119:51, 27 February 2022 diff hist +14 Love Actually... Sucks! More plot needed. Plot section only outlines the premise, does not summarize the middle or end.
- 19:4319:43, 27 February 2022 diff hist +1,636 Scary Movie →Production: Anniversary articles from Variety and Entertainment Weekly. Should be able to expand the Production section more ... later ... gotta eat.
- 19:0919:09, 27 February 2022 diff hist +80 Scary Movie Big Momma's House also briefly referenced, according to Variety.
- 18:5718:57, 27 February 2022 diff hist +88 Scary Movie Review from Joe Leydon of ''Variety'' was a positive review (according to both Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic) not that you'd know from the way that was phrased. Copyedit. Rephrase. The reviews overall were mixed and we should give proper WP:WEIGHT to the reviews that were actually positive.
- 18:4618:46, 27 February 2022 diff hist −6 Scary Movie Template:Portal bar instead of Portal, and move down.
- 18:3518:35, 27 February 2022 diff hist +127 Scary Movie Not sure if the EW article actually mentions The Usual Suspects but the Joe Leydon review at variety definitely does.
- 18:3018:30, 27 February 2022 diff hist +397 Scary Movie Sequel tagline. Might be better if moved to a different section?
- 18:2318:23, 27 February 2022 diff hist +1,592 Talk:Scary Movie Start class, it is better than that, upgrade to C class.
- 18:0618:06, 27 February 2022 diff hist −11 Scary Movie Failed verification. Joe Leydon was the critic for Variety at that time (and Lisa Schwarzbaum was the critic at EW). The quote text comes from the review at Variety https://variety.com/2000/film/reviews/scary-movie-1200462600/
- 18:0218:02, 27 February 2022 diff hist −12 Scary Movie MOS:NUMERAL better to use the word than the numeral in large sections of prose like the plot section... unless maybe her supposed age isn't an important plot detail at all.
- 15:2215:22, 27 February 2022 diff hist −34 Ghostbusters: Afterlife WP:CATVER that category is a bit of a stretch, it is debatable that it applies at all and it certainly isn't a primary genre. Undid revision 1074187350 by NeoBatfreak (talk) Tag: Undo
- 14:5914:59, 27 February 2022 diff hist −34 Ghostbusters (franchise) Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your changes with an edit summary. Two lists for four items seems unnecessary, and a list with a single item in it is just silly (because that is literally what this does)
- 14:4914:49, 27 February 2022 diff hist +102 Scary Movie Working title was "Scream If You Still Know What I Did Last Halloween". Fix dead link.
- 14:3514:35, 27 February 2022 diff hist +415 Scary Movie Partial restore. The source also mentions Halloween as one of the films parodied, but someone neglected to repeat the reference. Undid revision 1074230779 by Sundayclose (talk)