User contributions for 104.205.115.95

03:2203:22, 22 April 2023 diff hist +4 Lord Kelvin the simple rebuttal is this: is Stokes' theorem important to calculus? my opinion is "yes, it is". is calculus considered mathematical analysis? yes (no opinion here). he therefore contributed an important (arguably central) theorem to an area of mathematical analysis (calculus). therefore he did important work in mathematical analysis of electricity. take it to talk if you disagree. Tag: Undo

02:5702:57, 17 April 2023 diff hist +191 Clan Stewart in what world is either one the "good guy"?? do we have to pick one? surely we're allowed to abstain?????? how is the architect of clearances now the "good guy'?!?!

01:3701:37, 4 April 2023 diff hist −14 John Squire no one wants to see peter pettigrew dressing up as janny for hallowe'en. studly squire or bust. look at that alleged "hanging chin". christ Tag: Reverted

02:3302:33, 3 April 2023 diff hist +892 The Stone Roses add captain rock to the influences, provide source. share quote re: liam & RA being enamoured by the icon 89 NME cover.

23:4823:48, 24 February 2023 diff hist +1,025 John DeCamp add a proper ref for his participation as a civilian for babylift, and provide an archived link to his military service record and commendations. took THREE YEARS to get this stuff from NARA.

19:5219:52, 15 January 2023 diff hist −874 Function (mathematics) first of all: it's not me who has to take it to the talk page, it is the inserter. secondly: the source is low quality. one source does not permit insertion in the lede of a popular mathematics article. so i am restoring the correct version. everything regarding the ninja edit claims stands, as any other can verify for themselves (13-15 sept 2022). pretty obvious. Tags: Reverted references removed

01:0601:06, 13 January 2023 diff hist −1,411 Free energy principle same guy trying to re-insert his work at the start of the article. clearly others (also) thought it was not worth mentioning in the lede but you just refuse to accept that. you were told this last year by ME, and inserted it again afterwards. you are now doing it again. stop it. Tags: Manual revert references removed

22:1922:19, 12 January 2023 diff hist +110 C-Media added a brief statement about where you can find their stuff.

03:4103:41, 8 January 2023 diff hist +453 Windows 2000 improve the history section for, in my opinion, the greatest operating system of all time made by my hero and industry GOAT, bill.

03:5603:56, 8 December 2022 diff hist −841 Thales of Miletus the argument of "high quality source" fails without supporting citations. the onus is on the inserter, not the reverter, to establish the significance. it should be taken to talk first, as well. you cannot just insert this and say "high quality" and call it a day.

04:2004:20, 1 December 2022 diff hist −3 Convex geometry revert WP:GOODFAITH-- ruined formatting Tag: Undo
04:0304:03, 1 December 2022 diff hist +31 Training, validation, and test data sets the coolest thing is the metamorphosis of the academic genealogy.
00:3900:39, 1 December 2022 diff hist −55 Hermann Minkowski he did not "show that his former student einstein's theory of relativity could be understood geometrically". what he clearly stated was that both einstein and lorentz were "bold" with their claims. he provided foundations that "worked" for the theory but are far more general. his alternative derivation of lorentz' formula using pure geometry is PROOF of that.
00:2500:25, 1 December 2022 diff hist −841 Thales of Miletus at the very least this suggestion will have to ferment amongst the schools of thought until it can be added. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

22:4522:45, 30 November 2022 diff hist +258 Minkowski space you know how i know every "contributor" to this page is stupid by assuming it MUST be 'lorentzian' (minkowski's setup is MUCH more general, see pages 293-294)? because NO ONE has cited the carus translation, which is the BEST translation (and the one i used). adding cite (thanks to norm redington at MIT: https://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/SP20130311.html)

04:1904:19, 24 November 2022 diff hist −971 History of the function concept again, see edit: "22:35, 4 June 2018" by‎ Biblioworm that falsely claimed this content survived a WP:DRN. there was no DRN and User:Wcherowi outclassed User:RoneIn on the talk page. wake up wikipedia. how many times must "ninja edit+buttress with lies" with a specific WP:NPOV happen before you show some shame? outrageous Tag: Reverted
03:3403:34, 24 November 2022 diff hist −1,100 History of the function concept there was no such WP:DRN. the theme of ninja insertions and compounding them with lies continues. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&profile=all&search=%22al+Tusi%22+drn&title=Special:Search&ns0=1 reveals NOTHING in the archives. outrageous conduct on this website. Tags: Reverted references removed Disambiguation links added
03:2703:27, 24 November 2022 diff hist −950 Function (mathematics) remove series of ninja insertions by editors with WP:NPOV. the source is far from the calibre of Boyer. the journal is of low quality. this is worse than the lie that sat on the probability pages with broehmling article from scientific american Tags: Reverted references removed

00:3700:37, 19 November 2022 diff hist +96 Steve Lukather undo useless edit by 80's sam that ruined the infobox with luke's signature

03:2703:27, 18 November 2022 diff hist +546 Francis Bacon sockpuppet investigation withstanding, this is a good edit and adds important context to the article. it is placed well, too. Tag: Undo