Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Oberiko

A great contributor, has made about 2500 edits, his recent work categorizing World War II is admirable. I feel he needs to be rewarded for all the hard work and dedication.GeneralPatton 23:08, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks Patton, I accept your nomination. Oberiko 10:43, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. GeneralPatton 14:55, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
2. Support. Oberiko has also made good contributions to articles about strategy games and works of science fiction. Acegikmo1 19:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
3. David Gerard 16:31, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
4. Support --"DICK" CHENEY 18:41, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
5. Neutrality 16:25, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
6. Tuf-Kat 21:40, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)
7. Rhymeless 04:04, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
8. Geoff/Gsl 05:40, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
9. Lst27 03:43, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
10. Uncle Ed 18:03, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
11. Cecropia | Talk 18:06, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC) Thought I already voted for him...
12. Ilyanep 18:17, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC).

Comments

• I'm not sure adminship should be considered a "reward". Acegikmo1 19:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • I strongly agree with the above statement. →Raul654 18:01, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)
• His edits look good. How's his dealing with editing conflict? - David Gerard 19:54, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I've only dealt with a few admittedly. When a conflict does come up I'll ask the other party to talk it over on the discussion page in question. So far I haven't had anything go beyond that as an agreement has, so far, always been reached. Oberiko 21:26, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

• It doesn't sound like Oberiko's work is in topics that are particularly controversial. ;-) There's certainly nothing wrong with that. Isomorphic 00:22, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)