Mkmcconn has been here since September 2002 with over 3200 edits to his credit. He is especially good, in my experience, at untangling and defusing disputes over content of religion-based articles....a dangerous business indeed, and one that I think we are long overdue in rewarding with adminship. Jwrosenzweig 03:48, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Sincerely, thank you for the expressions of confidence. I am willing to serve, if the nomination is sustained. Mkmcconn 21:38, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Support:
- Jwrosenzweig
- RickK 04:00, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Maximus Rex 04:02, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- cprompt 08:31, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Pfortuny 09:03, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Graham :) 17:53, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- BCorr ¤ Брайен 21:01, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Showed great composure and balance in the Creationism debate a few months back. KRS 08:15, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Uncle Ed 16:14, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Heartily support. -- Kaihsu 17:42, 2004 Mar 1 (UTC)
- Smerdis of Tlön 21:41, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Luis Dantas 21:58, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Michael Snow 23:48, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Tuf-Kat 05:38, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Pollinator 18:22, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Fair, knowledgable, affable and indispensable. Wikipedia is fortunate to have him as a regular contributor. His compatriots on religion articles, Wesley and Visorstuff, would also be good admins if they are willing to accept the responsibility. B 22:55, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Angela. 03:52, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- Jake 07:33, 2004 Mar 5 (UTC)
- Support. We need more admins in his interest areas and he's great. -Visorstuff 17:34, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Support. On top of the qualities already listed, he's a good writer, and knowledgable. Wesley 04:58, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)