Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women of Truckee Making History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Parvin Darabi#Works. (non-admin closure) buidhe 23:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women of Truckee Making History (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the Wikipedia:Notability (books) criteria. There should be at least two non-trivial published works about the book. Pahlevun (talk) 01:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I am sorry as I deleted the AFD template by mistake. Please accept my apologies. But I have added some references. As the book was published 18 years ago and it is very hard to find more reliable references. I did my best. However, the book covers part of US local history and more importantly covers women. I believe the article has enough reliable sources to cover books notability. Thanks. Gharouni Talk 09:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Reno Gazette-Journal does have an article mentioning the book from Sunday, February 23, 2003, page 14. (https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/150830448/) If anyone has library access or newspaper.com privileges they can determine if it constitutes significant coverage in combination with the more local coverage. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.