Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Moe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Moe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous edits seem to have been done by the subject themselves Equine-man (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A respectable academic, according to this Google Scholar search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The Google Scholar results are enough to convince me that WP:NPROF is met. Papaursa (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Definitley meets WP:NPROF. Also, if the subject made the article, consider giving them a conflict of interest notice with this template. Kirbanzo^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 21:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets WP:NPROF. Frequently cited by independent sources. Sdmarathe (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep- Meets WP:PROF as stated above. This nomination fails to cite relevant deletion policy. COI can be dealt with through editing and tagging. Please see (WP:ATD). Thsmi002 (talk) 03:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)*[reply]
• Keep- sources including Google Scholar search show the article meets WP:NPROF Alex-h (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - even if she didn't pass the PROF test, based on the Post and NPR sources she passes GNG. Bearian (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.