Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidya Vihar Residential School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vidya Vihar Residential School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking this to AFD as I am unsure about this and I think PROD will be contested. I didn't think that the school pass WP:ORG or WP:N. Some of the references mention the school briefly, and the references claimed that the school is highly ranked, but I didn't think that it satisfies the notability requirement of the school. References about notable alumni also didn't confer notability to the school. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and India. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @SunDawn, I have added more information and references which will help you confirm Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for this organization. Please inform what else needs to be done. Rajeshcmishra (talk) 14:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment @SunDawn, I think A review of this page shows that this school has given a great boost to education and by reading its news references, it is known that it is doing a great job of education if it seems that it is not notable then we can work on it i think this page WP:TOOSOON should not be deleted. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 13:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks @Lionfox0909 !!

  Admin, Pls preserve page... Rajeshcmishra (talk) 10:59, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reading the new sources does not seem to have depth in them not pass WP:SIGCOV. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.