Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivikram Srinivas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trivikram Srinivas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this one meets WP:CREATIVE. bender235 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep as multiple wins and nominations of Nandi Awards, quite prominent and notable in India, meet the requirements of WP:ANYBIO. Also, a g-news search shows his meeting WP:GNG as well. While yes, the article has issues, in this case such are best addressed through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add some more sources to the article, particular for his prominence in India? --bender235 (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, new editor User:DoBacchoKiMaa does/did not quite understand style, tone, or ref format.[1] But as these are addressable issues, article format is being corrected and sources are being added.[2] Just takes a little time and care. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. Clearly meets GNG. If sources are out there, but not reflected in an article, that is not reason to nom it for AfD (per wp:before). Alternatives to AfD in such circumstances that are suggested by the guideline in such circumstances are to start a discussion on the article's talk page and/or project page, but not to bring it to AfD.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as per WP:GNG --Ashershow1_{talk•contribs} 18:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.