Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise of Kinaray-a
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Rise of Kinaray-a (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Book fails WP:NBOOKS and WP:GNG. Notable-ish author, but not enough to transcend to his works. Deadbeef 05:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The author may be somewhat notable, but notability is not inherited. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of notability. My search only gave me two very weak references http://www.thenewstoday.info/2008/10/03/book.on.kinaray.a.now.out.html and http://www.philstar.com/arts-and-culture/198406/five-books-iloilo . Both sources only briefly mentions the book.--Lenticel (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.