Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siti Zainab (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siti Zainab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No new notability since last two deletions. — Moriwen (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Indonesia. — Moriwen (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Dance. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:Comment well I think having a 43 year career isn't considered notable by Wikipedia now huh? Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC) [reply]

• Keep clearly a notable subject, she had a lead role in Taufan (1952) and a few supporting roles in notable Indonesian and Singapore films. The obstacle of this article it's just the source that must be translated to English and also a little extra work on searching Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the 'Zainab' who plays the lead role in Taufan (1952) is actually Zainab Samallo, a different actress from that era. Proofs can be found in the IMDb or Indonesia film center. Also, it seems all of Zainab Samallo's films have been incorrectly included in Siti Zainab's filmography, which further calls into question the actual notability of Siti Zainab. Ckfasdf (talk)

• Delete The article is a recreation of a previous version that was deleted following a deletion discussion (in fact there were 2 deletion discussions). There are no significant changes compared to the original article. Therefore, it should qualifies for speedy deletion under criterion WP:G4. Ckfasdf (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article was created by a confirmed sockpuppet, it shouls also qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:G5. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt, to prevent recreation. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.