Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seoplus+

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seoplus+ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. References are self references or passive mentions. Articles are about some other topic than the entity. CerealKillerYum (talk) 11:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Article is resting entirely on primary and unreliable sources, with no evidence of RS coverage. SEO agencies are not entitled to use Wikipedia as an SEO tool, if independent coverage isn't there to get them into Wikipedia the normal way. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing here seems notable. The awards are not even red links. The references are, at best, unimpressive. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The provided sources are not about SEOplus; they are just places where they have been quoted, which is not sufficient. CorporateM (Talk) 17:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This may be a fairly familiar product for those in the field but my searches found nothing good for this recently started product, with the best being this (News). SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.