- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No arguments for keeping in two weeks of discussion. Michig (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sentosa Plaza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This shopping centre exists, but lacks substantial non-passing coverage in RSs. Zero refs. Tagged for that problem for 2 years. Epeefleche (talk) 05:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 01:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- question I'm no fan of shopping center articles, but this one looks like it might have sources , though perhaps not in ?english, and perhaps not online. Has the nom. looked for them?. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found no non-English hits. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Three years was ample time to collect sources. --Ifnord (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.