Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Bank Savings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Security Bank Savings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. It's only references point to "trivial and incidental coverage". (WP:COMPANY) Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. –HTD 12:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given that I actually had done that, how valid is your over-used copy-pasted statement? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move back to Premiere Development Bank. The successor institution is not notable, but the predecessor institution is, and a deeper Google search shows that it is the primary subject in a number of third-party sources (such as this, this, this, this and this). --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 15:44, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Feel free to open an RM then. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This isn't cleanup-related. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.