Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Olongapo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SM Prime Holdings. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 16:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SM City Olongapo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability. Lacks sources. GrayFullbuster (talk) 02:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep A city deserves an entry. But needs citations per notability.Drjames1 (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't about a city. It's about a shopping mall. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I only found passing RS coverage for this mall. Coverage was focused on SM Prime. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to SM Prime Holdings. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, but more suitable target would be SM Supermalls where this mall is already listed. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 19:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to SM Supermalls, would seem the most appropriate place. Pol430 talk to me 16:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.